English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

4 answers

Because that's not how it works. "Survival of the fittest" is a concept popularized by persons other than Darwin. For purposes of evolutionary selection, 'fitness' is simply the ability to produce offspring that live to maturity; it is not purely an inherent characteristic but a rough measure of how well those traits promote survival in a given set of circumstances. What is useful in one environment may be detrimental elsewhere; some traits also have trade-offs, for example attracting a mate vs. attracting predators.

The disparity is not between 'fit' and 'unfit' - it is the degree to which greater 'fitness' allows one to produce more offspring, *and* pass on those traits to its descendants. Generally the difference is not dramatically apparent in a single generation, but adds up over time. In other words, 'fit' and 'unfit' are not absolute categories but relative concepts on a broad continuum.

Very few individuals are clearly 'unfit' - and they usually don't survive to reproduce. Only in a supportive society (such as ours) does such a thing take place.

2007-12-31 04:43:30 · answer #1 · answered by dukefenton 7 · 1 0

because society helps the unfit

2007-12-31 12:33:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

good health insurance

2007-12-31 12:33:01 · answer #3 · answered by But Inside I'm Screaming 7 · 0 0

So the fit can make fun of us.

2007-12-31 12:32:24 · answer #4 · answered by Story Unknown 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers