English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

When you point out that the government helps corrupt corporations ,with corporate welfare?

The blame for this falls on both the demarcates and republicans in Washington.

So why is it, that it seems to anger the republicans more?
Or am I wrong?

2007-12-31 04:24:11 · 26 answers · asked by RELAX 4 in Politics & Government Politics

I am talking about bailouts.

2007-12-31 04:34:58 · update #1

Info
Please read, I said corrupt corporations. I also take offence to those who fraud the welfare system. I do not mind helping those who are truly in need.

2007-12-31 04:49:59 · update #2

26 answers

The subject matter is not the issue, Some Republicans get angry whenever challenged.

I believe much of it has to do with how they insulate themselves from reality, their leaders have had to go to extreme lengths to try and stem the mass desertions from Bush's failed polcies.

In order to keep the few remaining Republicans in the dark, they have been encouraged to demonize the rest of the population, and not to listen to anything they have to say.

The Fox news propaganda, of Democrats being likened to al-Qeada is an example of this.

In short, they are a shrinking minority, and they are desperate.

It's great when they lose it though, because even more waverers see their true colors.

“Naturally the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
Hermann Göring(Nazi) 1946 Nuremberg Trials

;)

2007-12-31 10:08:57 · answer #1 · answered by . 5 · 0 0

i'm a enormously laid-lower back, low-key kinda person...i'm extra analytical/logical than emotional...It takes plenty to make me "indignant"...Your video could not in all probability make me indignant, it would not influence me or my family members in any way, and it is not even important. Screw around with our money and make it complicated for us to pay our costs and feed our families, then you certainly might see us get "indignant".

2016-11-27 00:28:20 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

This all goes back to those congenital mutations that take place in week 16 of fetal development.

Women that eat too much Red Meet in week 16 give birth to angry Republicans.

2007-12-31 04:57:30 · answer #3 · answered by Guerilla Liberal fighter 3 · 2 1

Because they don't want to think about corporate welfare, they'd just rather go on the same tired rants about illegals and welfare mothers, etc.

They don't want to contemplate things like the massive half a trillion dollar S&L bailout, which was a direct result of Reagan's loosening of regulation on the banking industry.

It's heresy for them to actually find any fault with the capitalist system, even when it involves enormous government handouts to huge corporations and direct contradiction of the free market principles that they give lip service to.

But mention a single mother with two kids getting $700 a month in food stamps and they get apoplectic with rage.

Go figure.

2007-12-31 04:40:52 · answer #4 · answered by celticexpress 4 · 1 0

Because that's their largely hidden agenda, and you're supposed to be fixated on dark-skinned immigrants and homosexuals while this flies under the radar.

It's what they're about, and they don't like it when people notice.

2007-12-31 04:39:02 · answer #5 · answered by ? 7 · 3 0

If your a true conservative....WELFARE of ANY sort... will piss you off!
Show me in the constitution where it says we should be bailing out ANYONE or ANY corporation for ANY reason.
Corporate or otherwise.... welfare is a liberal, and political creatiion. Its anti-capitalist....and it runs counter to the founding father's intentions.

2007-12-31 04:38:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

the one little thing that so many people tend to forget. If an indivdual commits fraud in terms of their own finances or goes bankrupt it only effects that person.

If a corporation does these things it can effect 1000's of people. if something happend to the corporation that i work for not only would i be out of work, but an entire town would be desolate and the businesses would start closing down. So yea should corporations sometimes be given a bailout.. HELL YES

2007-12-31 04:34:23 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

You are wrong. Liberals tend to be the angry folks. Good grief, has anyone actually seen a liberal that wasn't angry about something?

2007-12-31 04:29:25 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5 6

Not as bad as the HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS for social welfare to reward the lazy that doesn't want to work.

At least corporate tax breaks encourage work.

2007-12-31 04:29:09 · answer #9 · answered by infobrokernate 6 · 5 7

I see plenty of anger from the left. In fact I've noticed that a liberals icon will more than likely have a scowl on it.

2007-12-31 04:28:32 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5 7

fedest.com, questions and answers