They defend Bush policies. They approve the War in Iraq, without a word of the false way it was started. Aside from Ron Paul, every Republican Candidate sounds just like Bush, defend his stand on the issues, say little or nothing about the huge waste of money that Bush has approved, and have no solutions for the domestic problems that face America, like rising inflation, unemployment, crumbling infrastructure, etc.
Why would these Candidates defend a President that even many loyal Republicans admit has been a disaster, financially and otherwise? Why would they not step away from his policies and outline a new path for America's future? Why would their speeches echo the sentiments of George Bush, when Americans have ranked him so low in the polls?
2007-12-31 02:16:00 · 22 answers · asked by Me, Too 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Because they are all affiliated with Bush and his party. The only that stands up against bush policies is Ron Paul. And if you haven’t notice, no candidates want to follow the public (except Ron Paul), they want to do what ever the hell they want, just like Bush. Go to war with anybody, pass any law they want, while the people have little say about it….and maybe you don’t have a say because Bush party pays the media to hide the truth and entertain you with lies, gossip, sex, and games! I mean the only news channel to cover the treaty of the North American union was CNN when it first came out…only CNN…not Fox, MSNBC, or any other news station!
2007-12-31 02:31:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Ron Paul does not sound something like Bush and he's a Republican candidate. in fact he has the excellence of being between the very few who voted against going into Iraq back in 2003. He will additionally do away with the IRS and replace it with no longer something If he wins. that doesn't even remotely sound like Bush to me. Oh, and yet another factor...Ron Paul is extremely mind-blowing. he's incredibly a walking encyclopedia. That on my own makes him a Polar opposite!
2016-10-02 23:12:27 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Blind loyalty which will be their undoing.
2007-12-31 02:53:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I am not sure where this gibberish comes from, and I am wondering, where is any evidence to back this?
Huge waste of money?
Domestic problems?
As compared to...?
And if he is so bad, why are his approval ratings consistently higher than Pelossi's (lack of) Congress?
2007-12-31 02:45:20 · answer #4 · answered by Tinnian 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
That will change when it gets narrowed down. if they continue to support him they have no Chance. They all know that.
2007-12-31 02:39:18 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
They sound like Bush because your ears have been tuned to hear everything anti-Bush. When you hear anti-bush rhetoric, you smile and are in your comfort zone. conversely when you hear pro-Bush speech, it causes your teeth to grind and your knees to shake, you get nauseated and want to vomit. Your blood pressure goes up and your pulse skyrockets. In other words, your just another liberal whack job who had drank all the kool-aid the democrats and the media could put out.
President Bush has kept the terrorists out of the US and for the most part on the defensive. Would you want the opposite?
There's that Ron Paul character again. Except for ending the war, which he will find out he can't do without sacrificing American lives (only civilians then), I agree with most of his agenda. I just can't support him as long as he touts end the war no matter what crap he puts out. If there were no war, he would have my vote. I wonder what situation would war be okay for Ron Paul?
2007-12-31 02:34:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Because 59 million sheep voted for Bush last time, I guess they figure "If it ain't broke, don't fix it"
2007-12-31 02:28:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Its a Republican agenda. Their platform is terrorism. The only way that platform succeeds is by maintaining the populace in a constant state of fear. The problem is that over time it turns into the boy who cried wolf. This is bad news because Chertoff has said he had a "gut feeling".
Does that mean they plan on renewing that fear if it furthers the Republican agenda? This is terrorism at its best.
2007-12-31 02:26:20 · answer #8 · answered by Arcanum Noctis 5 · 4⤊ 2⤋
You are so far off base with your outrageous criticisms that I don't think your so-called question should even be posted.
2007-12-31 02:22:37 · answer #9 · answered by regerugged 7 · 5⤊ 6⤋
Why do you sound just like Nancy Pelosi's parrot?
2007-12-31 02:19:21 · answer #10 · answered by That's a Stupid Question 3 · 7⤊ 6⤋