2007-12-31 02:08:30 · 9 answers · asked by joseph b 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
While I do not always agree with her, she asks thought provoking questions. That is more than I can say for many who post on this site.
2007-12-31 02:12:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 4⤋
Since you haven't provided an example, there's no way to know if the poster is "generally wrong" or anti-anything.
But since you used a poster's name in your question, you have violated YA's community guidelines, and therefore, your question is "generally wrong". I guess the rules are only made for others? Oh, and I heard a rumor that free speech is still legal in America.
2007-12-31 15:06:20 · answer #2 · answered by edith clarke 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like her "controversial" and thought-provoking questions because they prompt discussion on "uncomfortable" issues. Since people are imperfect, it's human nature that institutions comprised of people (government, religious, etc.) will be imperfect as well. Therefore, I do not equate pointing out imperfections with being "anti", but as an effort to recognize, and maybe even fix, some of those imperfections. Apathy concerns me much more than "anti".
2007-12-31 12:10:09 · answer #3 · answered by sagacious_ness 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I do. I answered some of her outrageous questions and later got violation notices. It shows me she is prejudiced.
2007-12-31 10:16:49 · answer #4 · answered by regerugged 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Not at all. I often disagree with her on some points. But her posts/questions are well thought out and she asks questions that a lot of people--mainly the right-wing extremists--don't wat people asking.
Keep up the goood work, Eyota!
BTW--they are not "anti-Christinan"--they are critical of the religious right. The fact that they don't like their intolerance and narrow-minded arrogance challenged doesn't make such questions "anti-Christian." It simply underscores their unChristian attitudes. MOST Christians have no use for them an dtheir faux-Christianity and hypocrisy.
2007-12-31 10:16:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 2⤋
Probably you for one...loosen up a little. Everyone is entitled to his opinion. It's called freedom of speech.
2007-12-31 10:12:01 · answer #6 · answered by thom t 6 · 6⤊ 2⤋
Could you put this question in context by providing an example please.
2007-12-31 10:12:00 · answer #7 · answered by James Melton 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
not as obsessed as u r
never noticed
i is only an opinion
2007-12-31 10:11:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Provide some examples...
2007-12-31 10:10:57 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋