Consider the damage that has been done to America's image, credibility and standing over the past 7 years.... and then answer.
2007-12-30 18:06:24 · 19 answers · asked by Dream Realized 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No, I think he had more devious cohorts and better lawyers. We will need the best to rebuild from the ashes he will leave.
2007-12-30 21:29:57 · answer #1 · answered by HP 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
The people actually qualified to lead the country would never run, nor would they get elected. The voters don't like to hear the truth, even when it's something that needs to be told. Besides, the worthy people really don't want to deal with every action getting scrutinized and broadcast in the press - from how often they blow their noses to stumbling over an untied shoelace.
2007-12-31 02:50:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
He was the best muppet they could find, I happen to believe he was groomed for the role over many many years, starting with his time in the CIA. or earlier?? In person he may well be a normal down home kick back kinda guy, BUT the image thats been portrayed by his minders is that he's a deranged chimp who cant even pronounce the word nuclear fer krissakes!!! How can a guy like that be put in charge of the worlds largest nuke arsenal??? Mind you...what better cover could you have as a facade? Get the world thinking youre a dumbo, klutz buffoon chimp, and theyll never suspect youre really a muppet of the globalists and the military industrial complex. kinda sneaky when you think about it.
2007-12-31 02:10:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 4⤋
The Medicare Prescription Drug Plan that Bush accepted $400,000 from Drug & Insurance Company Lobbyists is a disgrace. and he has the ordasity to pretend being a good Christian. The history books won't forget this phoney.
2007-12-31 02:37:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
You know as well as I do that it's never about offering our best and brightest, but our best connected and most willing to play the corporate/political game. Do you think the front runners in either party running for president are really the "best"?
And GWB wasn't director of the CIA, his daddy was. GWB just invested OPM in one failed venture after another. His whole life, he's cashed in on daddy and grandaddy's names.
2007-12-31 07:05:28 · answer #5 · answered by VeggieTart -- Let's Go Caps! 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Yes. That and terrible movies mass-produced in Hollywood's crap factory.
2007-12-31 05:15:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I have no doubt that if he were allowed to run again, the American people would re-elect him in a heartbeat.
2007-12-31 04:14:20 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Why do I give a sh** what the rest of the world thinks of us? They take billions in aid and never disperse it to the people we are trying to help. They smile for the money and stab us it the back. The rest of the worlds countries, save a few select allies, are the ones with the image, credibility and loss of standing. Bush was elected and did a reasonably efficient job, considering the constant struggle with the Dem's obstructionism and a bias negative press.
2007-12-31 03:56:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
Nope, the people who would actually do a good job in the Office don't want anything to do with it.
2007-12-31 02:10:07 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 10⤊ 0⤋
Lol--NO!!! But that was a very funny question, though. Too bad it's all about connections rather than merit when it comes to politics.
2007-12-31 02:19:33 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋