2007-12-30 14:19:11 · 30 answers · asked by ? 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
hilary
2007-12-30 14:21:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 6⤋
Physical appearance really doesn't matter. Compared with the current stock, Pat Paulsen would have made a beautiful president.
It's the structural soundness and the healthy form of their policies that concern me. And I see there is much to be desired, and only a shell of stupid pandering promises that will be delivered.
2007-12-30 22:28:07 · answer #2 · answered by Boomer Wisdom 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Hillary
2007-12-30 22:30:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Fred Thompson
2007-12-30 22:29:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Mr McCain
2007-12-30 22:38:25 · answer #5 · answered by Stevie Jae 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hillary Clinton without question.
2007-12-30 22:47:16 · answer #6 · answered by Just my opinion 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The frog.
But if he is kissed, will he turn into the best looking running for president?
2007-12-31 16:19:44 · answer #7 · answered by mwmn35 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oprah Winfrey
2007-12-30 22:22:21 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
from both the stand point of physical attractiveness and the inner beauty the winner is hands down Billary oops i mean Hillary
2007-12-30 22:45:16 · answer #9 · answered by bearbait7351 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Purely on looks, I would have to say Huckabee on the Republican side and Hillary on the Democratic side. For what it is worth.
Happy New Year!
.
2007-12-30 22:41:48 · answer #10 · answered by Jacob W 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hilary Clinton. She looks old, and she really is, LOL. And she has really ugly hair and i don't think she'll make a good president!
2007-12-30 22:32:28 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋