Okay I know it's old news. But the Discovery Channel still talk about it. Why can't we here?
Ron and Nicole's blood in the Bronco.
O.J.'s finger cut all to hell like he had struggled with maybe , I dunno, a knife?
OJ had recently purchased a knife.
The "glove demo" was a joke. The one where it "didn't fit".
How do we really know he wasn't making appear the glove wasn't going on too snug?
The list goes on.
What do you think?
2007-12-30 13:54:44 · 36 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
he did it.someday he will tell on his deathbed.
2007-12-30 13:57:55 · answer #1 · answered by k 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
From what Ive read over a whole range of publications, it seems as if he AND his son may have been involved? Apparently Nicole was mixing with a fast crew (coke dealers) and she was by all accounts being a bit lippy about the drug scene there, she apparently had a few warnings about blabbing too much, The conclusion i came away with was that O.J's son may have been involved coz he was a coke head at the time and had also been exhibiting violent behaviour around that time? and that OJ may have been called in to help get his son out of the situation.? This may explain the unidentified sneaker print found at the scene??.....but who knows?...without proof its just conjecture, guess work and theories by journalists and hacks who need to sell stories to put food on the table.
2007-12-30 14:02:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
There is no question in my mind that he is 100 percent guilty. The whole thing was a farce and still is. It makes me sick that he is allowed to live his life in luxury because he moved to a state that will not allow his assets to be taken from him to pay the money he owes the Brown and Goldman families. I hope he enjoys playing golf all the time because I firmly believe that where he is going when he dies he sure won't be playing golf there!
2007-12-30 14:08:46 · answer #3 · answered by Chris M 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
They had more direct evidence on OJ than they did on Scott Peterson and Peterson got convicted go figure
What you have is an inept police force and an overmatched legal team. Darden had Clark had no business in the same courtroom as OJ's lawyers
2007-12-30 13:59:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I think OJ Simpson got away with the murders.
2007-12-30 13:57:13 · answer #5 · answered by They call me ... Trixie. 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The civil trial found him responsible for the deaths, so despite the fact that he snuck out of the felony indictment on mostly technicalities, he was actually found guilty, or at least legally responsible, in a court of law.
2007-12-30 13:58:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
All I can say is that they are two sides to the story , OJ side and the truth. Its upto the jury to make sense of nonsense, judge not that ye may be judged.
2007-12-30 13:59:53 · answer #7 · answered by quittara 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think they should of used the dog, Nicole owned an Akita, (very protective dog) and I am sure he would of attacked the attacker if unknown. BUT if the owner (OJ) yelled at the dog, it would of listened, and went away.
2007-12-30 14:00:10 · answer #8 · answered by just me 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, he's probably guilty but what can you do? He had people trying to plant stuff, blood missing from the vile. The state prosecuted themselves, not O.J
2007-12-30 13:59:55 · answer #9 · answered by SmartyPants 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Violent people think he's either innocent or justified.
Peaceful people think he's guilty as sin.
He may finally do some prison time for the Vegas hold up.
2007-12-30 14:00:43 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Those channels need to fill their airtime with something. The cheapest way is to recycle old stories. Just because they waste their time talking about it doesn't mean we have to also.
BTW Yes he did get away with murder.
2007-12-30 13:58:47 · answer #11 · answered by Rich Z 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋