How would a planetary government work?

Question

I've been reading a lot of fiction where there are different planets ruled by different people. How do you think these planetary governments would work?

I mean in terms of the court system, elections, etc.

Answer 1

It would/will be a federation of nation-states. Think of it like the United States government, except global, and each country would be like a state. Each nation would be able to govern itself, but the sovereignty of each nation would be taken away (nobody can declare war, have relations...). We'd probably all be using a single currency, and have universal free trade between every nation. A number of representatives, based on population, would be elected to some sort of global parliament. (Like the U.S. House of Reps.). I doubt we would have one person as "president of the world". It's just too much power for any one person to handle. I'm guessing it would be an elected group of people as the head of the government.

Answer 2

My opinion is that the only way a planetary government could work well, is if the government and people arrived from a different and heterogeneously governed planet, and simply re-established itself on a new planet.

I cannot see how Earth could have a single government anytime soon (within 5-10 generations anyway), since cultures are so powerfully fragmented. I suppose you could argue that the process could happen slowly, over a period of centuries, in many small steps, just a bit of autonomy loss every 20-30 years or so,....but I doubt that paradigm destructive violence could be avoided indefinitely. Except in utopian fiction.

Answer 3

Initially in our world it would fail, because of the vast diversity and various lifestyles that everyone in the world is accustomed to. Just in the United States, people who are only seperated a few hundered lives and completely different views and and live thier lives completely differently. Now with the entire world involved like Middle Easter countries and Asia. It would be an enormous task.

But thats not to say, that in a few more decades bringing everyone together and sharing cultures and lifestyles will no doubt spread across the planet. It could work but no currently in the World we live in right now.

Answer 4

the Un is about the closest thing we have right now, and it's not a good deal. They are a world government, but I can tell you, the minute you get any corruption involved, it is not good, you would have 1 government telling everyone what to do, no one could oppose them if they got out of control, and they would be free to oppress everyone. The only way that would work is if everyone was honest, there was no corruption, and you didn't have an evil dictator who wanted complete control of everyone's lives, other than that, it's not a good idea.

Answer 5

i think of a planetary gov't could artwork very like the U.N. works in the present day: grossly inefficient, exceedingly services to corruption and abuse of capability, plenty micromanagement and meddling into inner affairs, and judgements in the main made on the muse of ideologies quite than rational concept. If historic previous has taught us something, it somewhat is that super, centralized governments are the incorrect course to pass. they are merely too services to tyranny, corruption and over-regulation. the suited govt's are stable yet malleable, with minimum skill to tax voters or limit their freedoms. that somewhat ability a gov't with exceedingly-limited powers and a powerful, loophole-loose shape. I too have been analyzing fiction such as you describe, specially the Dune books and various Robert A. Heinlein. With a galactic civilization, little question there could be a extensive form of gov't structures and, like our cutting-edge array of countries right here on the earth, shall we glance on the various ones and notice what works and what does not. The complicated section could be somewhat discovering the instructions and utilising them to get greater effective gov't. govt's customarily and undesirable govt's particularly do in contrast to giving up capability. the end result's that by way of the years, financial inefficiencies and regulations on freedom slowly (or each and every so often immediately) deliver jointly till the two the gov't is overthrown via revolution, or the society implodes. the U.S. is one occasion--communism merely isn't sustainable by way of the years. human beings lose interest of being detrimental & oppressed, and in the event that they don't (or can not) preserve it, then their economic gadget collapses and chaos ensues.

Answer 6

Just imagine wal-mart. The whole world inside working for the Waltons.

Nothing else would go away except there would be no more illegal immigrants.

Answer 7

A select few would enslave the masses... oh... wait... that's already happening... so much for hypothetical's...

Answer 8

Poorly, if at all...very poorly.

Answer 9

not very well