Car Accident, who's fault is it?

Question

It was a green light, and the 1st car was at a dead stop for a while, and the I guess the 2nd car noticed the 1st car and suddenly slammed on the brakes, and then I (3rd car) slammed on the brakes and skid and hit the 2nd car, the 2nd car and me was traveling 20mph while the 1st car was at a dead stop on a green light; so who's fault is it?

Answer 1

Vehicle #2 is at fault for hitting vehicle #1, and vehicle #3 is at fault for hitting vehicle #2.

Answer 2

Its your fault. It doesn't matter whether the light was green and someone was blocking traffic. It doesn't matter that the car in front of you stopped suddenly. You are required to follow at a safe distance and to pay attention, if you had been doing both of those things you would not have hit the 2nd car.

Answer 3

You hit 2 which is failure to reduce speed to avoid an accident or following too closely to avoid the accident. It could be 1 saw something that you did not. Like a car that looked like they were not going to stop for their red light and that is why he wasnt moving. You did not mention if 2 hit 1,but if he didnt then I would guess 3.

Answer 4

Car #1 should be cited for impeading traffic but is NOT at fault in the accident. Car #2 is at fault because you always have to maintain assured clear distance and maintain reasonable control over your vehicle. I also would treat this as two seperate accidents as Car #3 should also be cited for striking you. He also must maintain ACD and reasonable control.

Answer 5

That's easy if you hit some one from behind it is your fault.
It doesn't matter how long they were sitting at a green light.

Answer 6

Almost this exact same situation happened to me. 1st vehicle was stopped at green light because he was lost, 2nd vehicle came around the corner and managed to stop in time, I drive a huge dodge ram and was unable to stop it in time (only doing 20 - 25). Insurance company is putting full responsiblity on me. I called a lawyer and there is nothing I can do, even though the police report clearly states vehicle 1 was obstructing the flow of traffic. Sorry - totally sucks!!

Answer 7

i'm so sorry this got here approximately to you. that's necessary know what the police record says--what the law enforcement officials on the scene say interior the record, what the different driving force says got here approximately, and what you stated to the officer and what he subsequently put in his record. additionally that's necessary evaluate in spite of if or no longer the different driving force replaced into noted (i.e., have been given a cost ticket) for thoroughly blowing that easy like an asshole. If he have been given a cost ticket, he would be what we call interior the regulation "negligent in line with se", meaning he's negligent and his negligent led to the wear. no could desire to coach it with witnesses. Are there any witnesses in any respect? you truly could only want one. If achievable, collect all your data in the previous intending to a distinctive criminal expert. As you recognize, many own harm legal experts artwork on contingency, meaning they get no longer something till they get a judgment for you--so they are stimulated to artwork stressful. perhaps the criminal expert you talked to replaced into only lazy using fact that's no longer an open-and-close case and it will take some leg artwork. in spite of if a criminal expert won't take your case, your assurance employer will artwork their butts off to get their money lower back from his assurance employer, using fact it replaced into his fault. So do no longer forget approximately to stay related alongside with your assurance employer. yet to reply to your question, NO, in case you proceeded in the process the fairway easy like a regulation abiding citizen, and he blew the sunshine to get his bratty baby to college on time, then you definately broke no rules and if justice prevails, could desire to be particularly compensated on your motor vehicle, your soreness, suffering, and lost wages.

Answer 8

The stopped car was a contributing circumstance, but not the cause. You striking the second car was the cause.

Even though the car should not have been stopped, you were in the best position to avoid the accident. I see the second car stopped in time to avoid the crash, only you did not.

Answer 9

The third car. He was following too close. It is almost impossible to avoid liability if you rearend another vehicle.