English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I am not an advocate of a MasterRace.............. but if some deffeciency in the human genome is minimized through lack of reproductive capacity is it then not unethical to circumvent this via embryo implantation in surrogate mothers ?

We could be perpetuating human suffering needlessly ?

We have always said non-conception is better than abortion both medically and ethically (unless you happen to be the Pope).

If nature takes its unimpeded course then will not inferior traits be minimized through lack of vitality in the womb ?

2007-12-30 10:06:02 · 2 answers · asked by klby 6 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

2 answers

There are other reasons for lack of reproductive capacity than deficiency in genes.

2007-12-30 10:10:51 · answer #1 · answered by toetagme 6 · 4 0

Just because a couple cannot conceive is no reason to say they are should not have the opportunity to be parents. There are men who cannot father a child to due illness in childhood. Or how about the woman who had cancer at a young age and cannot have a child. I see nothing wrong with surrogacy if all agree.

2007-12-30 18:23:42 · answer #2 · answered by mnwomen 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers