To those who say Clinton will immediately install a socialist govt. if elected, what is your proof?

Question

23 answers and not one tangible piece of proof.

Answer 1

I hate it when Conservatives yell "Communist" when ever socialistic sort of ideas get suggested. Stalin hated labor unions and capitalists hate labor unions. Stalin hated democracy and capitalists hate democracy. Capitalists don't want the middle class to have better pay. They don't care about better working conditions, safety, or the rights of the workers. They care about making money and will step on the heads of others to get more money. a democracy is about all the people...the poor, the rich, the middle class, the blacks, the whites....everyone. Capitalists want freedom, but just for themselves.

I'm not against free enterprise, just against a system that refuses to accept that every person is valuable...that the environment is for sale...that money is everything.....

If everyone was legally required to vote in every election, Republicans would only be in power if they recognized that the people are more important than money.....THe Democrats are moving in the same direction as the Republicans have...we need to hold our elected politicians to our will

Answer 2

There is no proof. The reality is that Hillary will probably bring little immediate change to Washington. She is a Washington insider and knows how to work the current system. I would think she would like to keep it intact for her own benefit.

And no doubt...our health care will continue to be worthless for at least the next 4 years.

Answer 3

The people who are running arund calling Hillary Clinton a socialist don't even know what the word means.

And are actually far more socialist than she is! Seriously. First: socialism is a political economic system that is dominated by state control or ownership of the means of productionn and distribution. In practice this is a two way relationship in a market economy (all socialist systems are market economies, with the exception of communism). Meaning that, although the means of production and distribution are controlled/owened by the state, the converse holds--the state is controlled by market entities (corporations) to a greater or lesser degree. In its extreme form, this system of corporate control of the state is termed fascism.

Now consider:
>the cons adamately support building roads, and in fact getvery strident when any suggestion is made tha ttax monies are used for public transit. Yet roads are purely a system of production/distribution owned and operated by the state, whereas rapid transit systems are often privatized.

>cons suport subsidies to extant corporations (e.g. the oil , coal, tobacco, farm, and drug industries.

>They support using the state to exclude immigrants in order to control the labor supply

>they support poliies like no-bid contracts for favored military suppliers.

The point is that the so-called "anti-socialists" aren't anti-social ist at all. What they are is selective. They generally oppose socialist-type policies that distribute goods and services to groups other than themselves, but usually support state control--and even outright ownership--ofthe means of production, though usually in terms of the "favored firm partnered with the state (fascist) model.

Note that they DON'T particularly support small business (e.g. favoring firms like WalMart over locally owned businesses), and favor large, entrenched systems while opposing innvative and entrepreneurial firms (e.g. supporting oil and coal companies, but not those devleoping technoligies like solar, wind, electric cars, etc.). Such policies are indicitive of a socialist-fascist systemof government, not of a free-market capitalist economicsystem.

Answer 4

when hell-ery was out of college, she worked with bob truehaft, he was the pres. of the California chapter of the communist party , together they defended one or 2 of the black panthers, who were on trial in Conn. for the torture and death of a fed agent, hell-ery went to court everyday, to defend these murder's, she would look for any civil rights violations, so she could apply for appeal's, they had enough evidence to take these guy's to trial, and she was defending them, against employees of the govt. of which she now is running for office, she is evil a liar cheat, and a big time socialist, if you do not believe me, well I have been watching her since before bill the pill was elected, I know what I am talking about, and will argue with anyone about it, it's your future and you better protect it, and you better be afraid, be very afraid

Answer 5

Who cares, she's not going to get elected. Her flip flopping and racist comments to Obama has doomed her getting elected. The closes she's going to get is she will be nominated but if you really want proof how's this:

The people can't make these choices, we will have to make it for them.
Hillary Clinton


We will have to take this away from them for the "common good."
Hillary Clinton

Answer 6

How about her own words.
Hillary Clinton would tell a San Francisco audience recently that Democrats will rescind the Bush tax cuts for the “common good.”
(“It’s time to put the common good, the national interest, ahead of individuals”), in the idea that the “village” (state) should raise the child
“…to develop religiously and politically informed advocates for the common good.”
4 million babies x $ 5,000 per baby = $ 20,000,000,000 per year.

Answer 7

Read her own words in published documents from her college days until now. Moreover, just listen to how she refers to herself. Neither liberal or conservative but rather a "progressive". Study up on the "progressive" movement in America since the 1930's. Purely socialistic communism...

Heck, just read her book "It Takes a Village" raising kids. It insinuates that good, Christian parents have no clue how to properly raise kids and it takes the entire community, especially the village government to raise your kids. Socialism pure and simple and in black and white.

The good news is that if she is elected, Republicans and many normal thinking conservative Dems in both the House and the Senate will never let her have her way to the point of ruining our Nation. Thank God!

Answer 8

There is no proof of that.

Most of the nay sayers on this site prefer to have corporate welfare.

Mrs. Clinton is not my preferred candidate but she deserves better treatment than that.

Answer 9

Just look at her proposals! There is your proof! I am surprised you don't notice that!

Also do you think it is right to vote for someone based on there gender? Don't you think it is immature to vote for Hillary just because she is a women?

I am no Republican either, but Hillary has ALL the signs of a socialist!

Answer 10

A socialist government is a government which mixes communism and capitalism. We are already living under a socialist government.

Clinton want to push for more and larger government programs. She is pushing towards communism away from capitaism.