English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

28 answers

No it does not bother me at all. What bothers me is the fact that because of Bush and his Republican administration our money which say "In God we trust" does not worth a paper on which they are printed.

By the way there is nothing of a kind as "One Nation Under God" is written on any US currency. So that your "patriotic" Avatar with a flag only proved your ignorance.

2007-12-30 08:47:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6 3

Ok. First, what is with the stero-typing of assuming that liberals are nothing but trouble-makers who hate everything and want total anarchy?

What some of us want are decent prices on gas, and not have to worry about our college students, who earn minimum wage, having trouble paying for it. And how about buying a box of cereal, or bag of potato chips, but getting only a container 1/2 full? Finally, how about some job security? I attended a friend's graduation from the local U, and the *principal* was talking about how job security is a thing of the past. You can be the best employee, and you still have to worry about mergers, downsizing, etc.

So, no "One Nation Under God" doesn't bother me. The Republicans AND Democrats who don't look out for the rest of America bothers me!

2007-12-30 08:58:30 · answer #2 · answered by oweaponx 4 · 3 0

Does it saying "E pluribus unum" -- In many, one -- bother you?

Evidently.

Do you think a man has to choose between God and Mammon, meaning money? If so, why mix the two up?

Still another in the endless, tedious, imbecilic round of nitwit conservative liberal-baiting. Y'all musta been real frustrated when it became politically incorrect to bait "the coloreds" or the Jews. I guess your "faith" is so weak you've got to keep shouting it out to convince yourself, instead of living it in quiet dignity like a normal adult.

PS -- In God We Trust, all others pay cash. Don't be afraid to ask for credit, we are very polite in refusing it.

2007-12-30 08:57:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

It's only been on the currency since 1952, and look how things have been screwed up since then. It's like "Under God" in the pledge of allegiance added in 1959. We can change that at any time.

2007-12-30 08:51:56 · answer #4 · answered by Mezmarelda 6 · 2 0

Louis A. Bowman replaced into the 1st to start up the addition of "under God" to the Pledge.He stated that the words got here from Lincoln's Gettysburg handle.In 1951, the Knights of Columbus, the international's greatest Catholic fraternal provider company, additionally began alongside with the words "under God" interior the Pledge of Allegiance. President Eisenhower, nevertheless raised a Jehovah's Witness, have been baptized a Presbyterian only a twelve months in the previous. He spoke back enthusiastically to Docherty in a communique following the provider. Eisenhower acted on his suggestion right here day and on February 8, 1954, Rep. Charles Oakman (R-Mich.), presented a invoice to that consequence. Congress surpassed the needed law and Eisenhower signed the invoice into regulation on Flag Day, June 14, 1954. The word "under God" replaced into included into the Pledge of Allegiance June 14, 1954, by utilising a Joint decision of Congress amending §7 of the Flag Code enacted in 1942. "In God We believe": The motto is unfavorable for certainly one of those motives, yet remains critically supported by utilising a majority of people. in accordance to a 2003 Gallup poll, ninety% of people approve of the inscription on U.S. money. The company Clause of the 1st modification states that Congress shall make no regulation respecting an company of religion. Critics contend that the motto's placement on money constitutes the corporate of a faith or a church by utilising the government. The acceptable courtroom has upheld the motto using fact it has "lost by rote repetition any important non secular content cloth"; so-talked approximately as acts of "ceremonial deism" that have lost their "history, character, and context". In such appropriate judgements as Zorach v. Clauson, the acceptable courtroom has additionally held that the rustic's "establishments presuppose a acceptable Being" and that government popularity of God does no longer symbolize the corporate of certainly one of those state church using fact the form's authors meant to limit. Constitutionalists merchandise to sworn judiciaries employing historic context in what they suspect could desire to be a uncooked textual interpretation. some activists have been straightforward to circulate out the motto on paper money as certainly one of those protest. besides the reality that federal regulation (18 united statesC. § 333 and 18 united statesC. § 475) prohibits defacement and alter of forex under specific particular circumstances, no documented circumstances exist of prosecution for such action, and the Federal Reserve generally recirculates further defaced notes

2016-10-20 10:48:06 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Yes, yes, it is a good idea to have your facts straight when you ask a question, it says IN GOD WE TRUST, and I as a DEMOCRAT am proud of that fact, One Nation Under God is in the pledge of allegiance, in case you weren't aware

2007-12-30 08:52:31 · answer #6 · answered by Girly Q 4 · 3 0

All that bothers me is that there aren't more zeros next to the number "1" in the corners of the bills in my wallet.

Correction: It occasionally bothers me when Cons try to make an issue of it.

2007-12-30 08:51:10 · answer #7 · answered by golfer7 5 · 5 0

Yeah, the US Mint is out to intentionally offend anyone who doesn't believe in God. I think that violates the implied right to privacy supposedly in the Constitution.

2007-12-30 11:25:15 · answer #8 · answered by Jack 3 · 1 0

I'm not a liberal but god is not a proper noun, it addresses no one god so that could represent many religions... As for people with no religion" shut up!!" you have no reason to complain...The only people that can complain are poeple with many gods or with no god and for them i understand the problem but deal with it why change a part of our history for something that stupid...

2007-12-30 08:47:11 · answer #9 · answered by iridezerodecks66@sbcglobal.net 1 · 0 2

Does it bother you that it doesn't mention God on your Visa or MasterCard? Or on your checks? Being a good Christian - you probably shouldn't use credit cards or checks since they are Godless! And since these little slogans are so important to you....why don't you plaster a big sign on your Ford Focus saying "In God We Trust." Or maybe you could paint your double-wide with a big "ONE NATION UNDER GOD." Because if you don't - you must obviously hate God.

2007-12-30 22:13:08 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers