2007-12-30 05:13:59 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Physics
It's well known that the high voltage transformer used in the fluorescent light's ballast acts as an evil amplifier, which would allow Satan to unfairly bias the discussion. You've find this clearly stated on the tube wrapper label under the warning about proper disposal.
2007-12-30 05:21:14 · answer #1 · answered by Dr. R 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
My examination of such things has taken place for the most part at the library and, indeed, under fluorescent light. My conclusions, however, have generally been pretty ordinary.
2007-12-30 06:07:52 · answer #2 · answered by Toby G 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We r no longer claiming it rather is a spirit. that's those yogis who spend yrs in getting to know the very fact of God's existence. God has no sort. properly, how do they tutor it? technological information isn't so progressed that it may tutor it now. If u wan't the information then watch for one hundred yrs, in all probability via that element, technological information wud hav the information!! purely bcoz, there's no information it does not propose God or "spirit" does not exist. If u can, comeon tutor it rather, that it ia no longer a spirit. Can u??
2016-11-26 20:59:43 · answer #3 · answered by northcut 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Satan would absorb all the light (Prince of Darkness) so that wouldn't help and God outshines any light, so that wouldn't help either.
2007-12-30 07:13:26 · answer #4 · answered by hello 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This has already been done, and the results have been published in the Journal of Fluorotheology. I guess you were just too lazy to do the research.
2007-12-30 05:52:01 · answer #5 · answered by Dr D 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You can't examine something that doesn't exist beyond the pages of a poorly edited collection of stories.
2007-12-30 05:21:19 · answer #6 · answered by Resident Heretic 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Because F = G(m1m2/r^2)
2007-12-30 05:17:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
We can't see them because they don't want us to see them. If we could, the fundamentalists and evangelists would be ALL over it.
2007-12-30 06:08:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
charlie bloody giving everyone thumbs down again before posting his answer, well done mate.
2007-12-30 05:32:06 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Whatchoo mean "we"?
2007-12-30 05:27:05 · answer #10 · answered by Charles M 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋