I am not rich and donate money and items to charity. I would just be more generous if I were rich.
2007-12-30 04:32:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Individuals! I have traveled all around Africa...I found out that loads of the money given to AID charities for example doesn't even make it to the people who need it...most of this money gets blocked by the corrupt governments.....If you want to give money to a good Charity try a small one such as www.FOMO.co.uk they are a grass routes charity and i garuntee every penny will be spent on where it is most needed!
2007-12-30 04:15:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by Help! 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
of course i would.
give them money?
getting people something specific just limits the things you can do w/ it so i'd just give them money
Edit:
wait, were charities or individuals choices?
if so, i would help charities because you don't know how individuals would spend the money
2007-12-30 04:07:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by its not mine officer 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
you're making an incredible element. i do no longer think of actual conservatives think of like this, nonetheless. the two the Republican AND Democratic events have been taken over with the aid of those with ulterior reasons...it is exactly the reason i'm no longer a Democrat and owe 0 loyalty to the two of the events in any respect. IMO, a real American Patriot thinks with the form and invoice of Rights, and what's right for usa, no longer something of the worldwide. maximum individuals no longer think of like this and can purely extremely watch television and the only information that they get is from the media... how lots of them particularly have study the "Patriot" act or any of the present day expenditures popping out of Congress? It takes time, yet conserving your rights do. to respond to the question which you asked, you're suitable. Socialism is exactly that. the hot worldwide Order that Bush Sr. has noted is interior the approach of taking place and it is the result. companies that they desire around would be triumphant, and ones that the elite do no longer care approximately won't be triumphant. The undesirable get poorer and the wealthy get richer...trickle down concept is purely BS.
2016-10-09 21:26:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would not donate to charities becouse I belive all of the money donated does not get to the charitie 100%. I would give it to the individuals straight up front.
2007-12-30 04:08:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Vince Wilfork 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Having a person in the family with a specific disease, I would delegate monies towards that disease's cure. Individual charities are good but not for me and my close needs for a sick person in the family that needs medical help due to the disease.
2007-12-30 04:09:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by cadaholic 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think charities are better because they help a large group of people rather than just an individual, i would certainly give money to charities like cancer research and nspcc.
2007-12-30 04:08:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would help charities by giving them money.
2007-12-30 04:09:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would help both when and if i can. I have and will continue to do so. And by the way, I'm not rich. I just tend to work my a55 off for what i get. I don't like seeing anyone down.
2007-12-30 05:09:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Both, I would give to charities that helped kids and to handicapped children and children with poor families.
2007-12-30 04:11:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by lisa_sonydadc 6
·
0⤊
0⤋