i) is it national loss, International loss or individual loss.
2007-12-30 02:58:55 · 31 answers · asked by Rupesh 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
its a big loss 2 pakistan and to the cause of democracy
2007-12-30 15:46:53 · answer #1 · answered by vicky 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Bhutto is no more is national loss, international loss and individual loss all three. in one.
2007-12-30 11:10:22 · answer #2 · answered by ashka 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Pakistan has troubles that go far deeper than whether a former prime minister is alive or not.
The country needs to get its house in order before the world will take Pakistan very seriously.
For now, we're sad the Bhutto died, but we see Pakistan as a sadder thing.
2007-12-30 11:03:02 · answer #3 · answered by Stuart 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Bhutto's death is a loss to Pakistan.especially because at a time when she was trying for the restoration of democracy.
I am not a Pakistani,am an Indian.I myself was shocked when i heard this news.A former Prime Minister who was sure to become the next PM being killed like this is really sad....
I hope Pakistan and its people will be able to come out of this crisis..
2007-12-30 11:49:44 · answer #4 · answered by Alien 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Loss for America
2007-12-30 11:32:04 · answer #5 · answered by kailasasundaram P 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The last of a series of indignities heaped upon a woman who dared to have as much power in a Muslim country as a man.
Pakistan had a woman Prime Minister (Bhutto) while America has never had a woman President. And she should have become Pakistan's leader again, instead of the corrupt Musharraf who posed as Bush Jr's lap dog.
No wonder they killed her!
2007-12-30 11:03:38 · answer #6 · answered by MassLass 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
For me, it is a humanity loss. A woman got killed in a country and that is a loss of humanity more than anything else.
2007-12-30 18:59:38 · answer #7 · answered by MS - Believe in Ek Oankaar 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
One thing only, no democracy there any more, it died with Benazeer, and it is a national, international and individual loss, all, together to everyone on this planet who LOVE peace and human values and democratic way of life
2007-12-30 11:15:28 · answer #8 · answered by Harinder S. Johal 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
why was she toppled out of office the first time.why did;nt the people revolt back then to keep her in office.she got involved in dirty politics,thus she paid the price for it.i don;t know if she would of been any different then what is already over in that part of the world.i;d like to see her track record of when she was in office before in power. i would have to say this is an individual loss.she was being just like every other politician making promises just to get into office for the glory and the power.then once in power forget about the people.sorry she is dead,but that;s the price you take when you try to become top dog.
2007-12-30 11:31:01 · answer #9 · answered by bigjon5555 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
A woman is dead just because she dared stand up for the rights of the citizens....ALL the citizens. My "view"? It's a damn shame that it comes to a bunch of unconcerned, unaffected foreigners to intellectually (and I use the word lightly) discussing the matter on the internet as if it's no more important than Jamie Spear's pregnancy, or the new Will Smith movie.
2007-12-30 13:21:14 · answer #10 · answered by missbeans 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋