That one on the cover of National Geographic last month--Dracorex! A cool looking beast! And found in South Dakota, so, the world just reeks with possibilities!
2007-12-30 03:50:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by Isadora 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
No. This happened 7 years ago and it should have been dealt with then. It wasn't rape and it was consensual. However I certainly would not like it if it happened to my daughter or son. Having said that, The man came forward and apologised for his involvement. Why was the girl there for in the first place, if not for a party etc. I certainly do not condone his involvement, but I do put some blame on him for not stopping the whole debacle. I do think the other chaps should come forward and give there side, instead of letting Johns take the fall. In my mind they are cowards and certainly not Sportsman like. Also the girl knew what she was doing and I did not hear the word "No" come out of her mouth while been interviewed. Whoever she is probably had issues before this happened 7 years ago. Otherwise why not complain the day after the situation and not four or five days later. As far as the NZ police are concerned its a open and shut case. So why are the Media so intent on bringing something like this up now. Admittedly sportsman particularly the Footy guys need to clean up there act. We have juniors coming up the ranks and the violence that is happening now both off and on the field with and against woman has been a regular occurrence of late. But why bring something that happened 7 years ago that was dealt with then. There have been others that have taken the news by storm, why not use all those as an example. there have been too many to mention. Whats the go with this person, If not for money. That sucks. Also others that know the girl have come out and it puts her story in another light. I gather the journo who put the story out has an issue about Johns and the game.
2016-04-02 01:50:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would call my friend, she is a famous Anthropologist, noted world wide, and ask her to come check the critter out! I dug up something in what was to be a flower bed once and we had a field day with it! Those folks are so very smart, such interesting stuff! I would just want it to be a new find! She has many of those that she keeps secret... well, she shared a few with me but I'm not telling where they are! And, God knows I don't know what they are! Neither does she, that's what makes it so neat! She is one of the bestest, we have so much fun together!
2007-12-30 06:15:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Pterodactyl would be cool. Never heard of a Felix Atrox.
2007-12-30 01:59:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by Aloha_Ann 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Felix Atrox, wow.
Here kitty kitty.
20,000 years old should set a record find.
2007-12-30 01:12:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mariana Straits 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Well Wally I would probably be in shock, and would probably want it to be some kind of dinosaur, like Brontosaurus, that was my favorite and of course I would like a finder's fee! lol!
What the heck is a Felix Atrox??
2007-12-30 00:10:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by Peapie 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
Well I do not believe the world is 20,000 years old, so give me a skeleton that is about 6,000 years, and I can name it... MASTODON!!! ya! Complete with hair!
2007-12-30 11:00:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by MBlessed (SOC) 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
The first thing that came to my mind on this would be the Woolly Mammoth with out a doubt. I think it would be so neat to find the skeleton of one of them.
2007-12-30 01:41:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by SapphireB 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Found a bear from at least 20,000 years ago, it was complete except for one claw.
2007-12-30 03:43:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
A lion skull would be fun to find but I think maybe a woolly mamonth would also be fun to find too.
2007-12-30 00:21:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by doxie 6
·
1⤊
0⤋