2007-12-29 22:05:53 · 17 answers · asked by alphabetsoup2 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
There was no exit strategy.
2007-12-29 22:12:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
fix the problem and leave. clearly they didnt count on the pelosi/reid regime using the defense of the ethics and values of this country in foriegn policy for personal and political gain. its hard to successfully defend this country when liberal extremists find nothing wrong with unilateral surrender, poltical stumping in syria(pelosi) a known terrorist sympathizing country, equating national defense in terms of economics to (no im not making this up) peanut storage, over 36000 requests for pork spending...aka..read that vote buying...(pelosi reid) tied to the defense bill without debate, and of course the whopper joke, betrayus(moveon) when the progress in iraq has clearly proved the man entirely correct. the only "mistake" , if you want to call it that was counting on liberals to use common sense in the defense of this country. given the no response policy of clinton to uss cole, african embassy bombings, wtc one and at least six bonafide chances to capture or kill bin laden in sudan, obviously giving the liberals the opportunity to display such..."common sense" is part and parcel of why fixing this problem in iraq is taking so long. its hard to follow a plan like an exit strategy, when half the people in congress have alterior motives
2007-12-30 07:45:42 · answer #2 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
His strategy was 'war profiteering' until January 2009, possibly longer if he can figure out how to become the supreme dictaster of the USA.
Jeff Gannon calls him 'lips'.
2007-12-30 08:04:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Win the war Not to make the mistake of leaving before the job is done. As past administrations have done such as in Somalia which by the way is why Bin Laden said he attacked knowing we would not finish what we started.
2007-12-30 06:17:56 · answer #4 · answered by littletwin2000 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
The exit strategy from the beginning was to drawn down the troops when it stabilized. Bush said from the beginning he saw us there until 2009 or 10.
2007-12-30 06:12:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
It was what Dr. Phonius Bloviate calls "The Attenuated MLK" methodology. In summary:
"I have a dream ... end of plan."
2007-12-30 06:51:10 · answer #6 · answered by kill_yr_television 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
To send em all to meet their virgins, and let Allah sort them out.
Make Iraq an official territory of the USA.
2007-12-30 06:53:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
what was our exit strategy for WWII defeat Hitler and Japan... same here defeat Terrorist in Iraq and Afghanistan and establish democracy...
2007-12-30 07:08:15 · answer #8 · answered by ss 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
bush sent US troops to iraq under-manned, under-equipped and WITHOUT an exit strategy, which is why it turned out to be "the debacle in the desert".
2007-12-30 06:09:58 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Strategy? What's that? Oh...let me ask Carl Rove. Well he's gone. DADDYYYYYY! HELP! THEY DIDN'T GIVE ME THE QUESTIONS IN ADVANCE AGAIN. I'm a swat me some flys soon, Y'all just wait and see when we round em up. Bring 'em on! Where's my fly swatter?
2007-12-30 06:12:39 · answer #10 · answered by kevin t 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋