What do you think about Kate Middleton???

Question

Is she a good princess to be??
Can she do everything better than The Late PRincess Diana????

Princess Diana & Kate Middleton.Who do you think is the best?? ( Please write down your reason)

Answer 1

I don't understand to those who keep comparing Kate with Diana. Kate is not Diana and will never be Diana and I don't think she wants to be Diana or compared with Diana. Kate is Kate. She would have her own way to charm the public one day (if she finally ties the knot with William).

I've just read an interesting article lately (British paper) where the writer plead the public to leave the girl alone. Think of 10 years later when the RF might faces turmoil, and smiling Princess (or Queen) Kate could be the saviour of the RF image. She IS, all this time, keep smiling, no matter what. She's discreet and loyal. Apart from her not-working thing, she's a good deal for William (and for the RF). She might do some good activities beside her parties and vacations. Who could have known? None of us knows who she really is.

I wouldn't bother to comment on what class she's coming from. People shouldn't be classified into classes. So what if a commoner falling in love with a royal, or the other way around. Love will find its way.

Answer 2

Perhaps a better comparison to Kate Middleton would be the Queen Mum, the first "commoner" to marry into the Royals since the Middle Ages. Lady Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon at first turned down her future husband and apparently thought about her choice a good while before she accepted his proposal.

Kate is approximately the same age as Prince William, and given that they lived together at St. Andrew's University, they probably have more similar interests than did Lady Diana Spencer and Prince Charles--a pairing that in retrospect was obviously an arranged marriage. It's not a matter of which woman is "best", but a matter of who is the more suitable personal choice by contemporary standards. In other words, blood lines and virginity don't matter as much as compatibility.

Answer 3

Melody, You heard it on the internet and what website grow to be that? have they have been given a "touch us"so which you would be able to verify that what this website stated is actual? In different words, you need to ask the respected source if Kate Middleton can not conceive a toddler and that would purely be Kate Middleton.

Answer 4

Well, she seems more of an equal to William, which I think is more in her favor. The age difference between Diana and Charles was a bit of a contributing factor, because everyone got caught up in the "fairy tale" aspect of "prince sweeping young virgin off her feet". Kate seems more able to "give as good as she gets" as far as what she wants out of a relationship early-on, which, I think, shows a strength that perhaps Diana lacked early in her marriage.

I think looking at it as "doing everything better" is the wrong way to approach it. She will do it differently -- she is, after all, a different person, as is William different from his father. Hopefully, everyone has learned from past mistakes and will be able to chart a different, more successful course. William, if he has ANY sense at all, has seen the damage that can be done in an spectacularly unequal relationship where the spouses have nothing in common. Perhaps that knowledge will help him and Kate built a strong, loving marriage in the midst of publicity chaos.

Answer 5

IMHO, Kate Middleton is completely bland, as is Prince Edward's wife, the Countess of Wessex.

She lacks the charisma and emotion of the late Princess of Wales, who was ready and able to publicise her opinion of the Firm that she'd married into. I'm not a fan of hers, but at least she had fire.

I can't remember the face or personality of Ms Middleton, nice as she may be, unless it's placed in front of me.

Answer 6

Not a lot, her and Diana are one of a kind, insignificant

Answer 7

Two Royal Families in Great Britain have claimed of them to be descendants of the Royal House of David, a Bloodline which supposedly produced many of the ruling Houses of Europe today, including the British Monarchy and current ruling House of Windsor. The other family important to this lineage is the the Scottish House of Stuart (Spencer), whose most infamous descendant was the late Princess Diana. The fact that both these lineages came together in 1981 with the marriage of Charles and Diana might seem as mere coincidence to those not knowing any of the things contained in this site, yet I assure you, it was an arranged marriage to bring about the beginning of a new age of monarchy. While there is discrepancy as to whether or not the Windsor claims to the Throne of England are legitimate (being descendants of the Germanic House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha), most agree that the Stuart lineage are not only the rightful heirs to the Throne of England (and Scotland), yet also to the Throne of David, and Israel itself. In light of this, it was therefore of paramount importance that the Windsor's seek out a 'Virgin' of the Merovingian Bloodline to marry into, in effect, to finally legitimize their long held occult power and authority claimed of them (being descendants of Crusader Godfrey de Bouillon, who was "King of Jerusalem" in 1099 AD), as well as creating what they see would be a unique Christ descendant from such a union of their unique lineages that would forever legitimize their shaky Monarchy without question, and so, a Merovingian Virgin was sought and found in the young and perfectly naive, Diana Spencer.

This intriguing and most infamous of arranged marriages was not hatched solely by the Windsor's themselves, it was of far more ancient design than most have previously thought. Some of my more astute colleagues trace it as far back as the Knights Templar, the shadowy anti-Semitic blood cult who had its own birth in the dark recesses 'neath the Temple Mount at Jerusalem during the time of the Crusades. However, the original plan and powers which ultimately led to the relationship between the Prince and his seemingly 'new love interest,' can actually be found in the latter end of the first century and much longer before that, Genesis 3:15. Its mysterious proponents make up some of the most interesting occult personages throughout history. From the Garden of Eden to the land of Nod, from ancient Druid groves to the Crusades, a guardianship was formed, a heritage created, and a lineage prospered. The crusading Templar's themselves became involved upon learning of the mystery, after which they became the most affluent organization in all of Europe, second only to the Church itself. Therefore, many of us still wonder exactly what was it the Knights Templars had found underneath the ruins of the Temple Mount, and kept in their possession which brought them such vast wealth and prestige among both European monarchies and the Church at the same time. Some say they unearthed the lost Ark of the Covenant or other religious relic yet judging from the way the Church reacted in their great need for secrecy at what was actually found, placed the Templars in a curious position from which the very nature of this information could harm the Church itself.

Answer 8

upsy daisy

Answer 9

she is beatiful .and also always spending money . not comment

Answer 10

She belongs to the spoiled, greedy self obsessed club that we are supposed to look up to....ha ha