English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Germs being bad for the planet, white blood cells being good for the planet.

2007-12-29 13:03:21 · 15 answers · asked by Big Will 4 in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

15 answers

I think both.

Some are there for the betterment and survival of the entity. Others are there only for themselves.


~J.M.

2007-12-29 13:08:59 · answer #1 · answered by lightninbug76 3 · 0 0

Heres a little bit of a different answer.
The big microscope is at the place of Golgotha, upon Jesus Christ. Germs are not allowed into heaven. So Jesus died on the cross and ( He himself, the sinless God Man) took all the germs of the world into his body. (germs as the sins of the mankind.) The heavenly Father was pleased because His Son removed all of the germs of the earth and He Himself became one big nasty germ!
There, Gods justice is now satisfied and we can have eternal life as a free gift, by simply believing in Christ.
P.S. The white blood cells are the power of the blood of Christ to forgive sins.

2007-12-29 13:58:35 · answer #2 · answered by Saved By Grace 2 · 1 0

Depends on whether you view natural catastrophes as a good thing or not. Historically speaking the biggest of changes came about after thousands of species were wiped out - without the extinction of the dinosaurs you'd be a small mousey-type thing in a burrow. Disasters seem to spawn change, and change is always good for life.

In the short term however, humanity is probably the single worst, most dangerous, deadly and destructive organism ever to live on the planet. We are a cancer to life as a whole. However, with all those large mammals (the largest land animal in Europe used to be the Aurochs, a kind of wild cow, nearly as big as an elephant, now we've wiped them out it's probably deer) we so thoughtlessly killed off life has definately taken a different turn.

2007-12-29 13:07:37 · answer #3 · answered by Mordent 7 · 0 0

If you put the planet under a microscope, humans would be germs. Definitely.
Some of us could be non-malignant though.

2007-12-29 13:07:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

germs-no, VIRUSES. The AIDS or EBOLA virus. And cities would be cancerous tumours. :(

there are a few good people in this world who are the white blood cells trying to eat up all the germs.

interesting question!

2007-12-29 13:05:51 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Germs, of course! Most humans are indifferent now and don't seem to have the "Help thy neighbor" ethic anymore and are wasteful and polluting the environment without any idea they will ruin the Earth sooner or later!!! Too much into themselves...........

2007-12-29 13:10:40 · answer #6 · answered by Knarf 5 · 0 0

Not all humans are the same. Some are animals, some are demons, some are angels, some are human. In the context of the Planet we would show up as all kinds of helpful and unhelpful organisms

2007-12-29 13:07:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

germs because white blood cells work together, do they not?

2007-12-29 13:06:25 · answer #8 · answered by Apollo 1 · 1 0

it would probably look like a bowl of rice in the middle of a field of black birds, meaning there are good people and bad people out there, you just have to find something good in each person no matter how bad you think they are gotta think positive my friend

2007-12-29 13:08:02 · answer #9 · answered by just a mom 3 · 0 0

we are germs on mother earth

2007-12-29 13:08:51 · answer #10 · answered by Valley Mental Health tooele Utah 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers