for a child? yes.
2007-12-29 12:22:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
After a State or Province, depending the country you're looking at its bad. As a city-name that is a tad differant however. They can be used most times I would think.
Overall however I would still stick to the normal "Person" name such as Peter, John, Janet, & Sarah ect...
2007-12-29 12:28:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by pblahut70 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
For a child? Yes. You know what Iowa stands for, don't you? It's a joke of course not actuality, but the joke is is that it stands for:
I diots
O ut
W andering
A round
2007-12-29 12:24:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by First Lady 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
It's always a bit dumb to call a child after a place ( in my opinion), there are so many "people's" names out there...
2007-12-29 12:24:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by yarzun 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes! It's a friggin STATE!!! It's a horrible name for a person, just like Alabama. The poor kid is gonna have to live with it the rest of his/her life and will probably end up being teased, so it's a bad idea to name your kid that. I have seen worse though. ***cough***Moxie Crimefighter***cough***
2007-12-30 06:42:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, are you naming a state? Cuz Iowa is already taken. Oh wait, this is baby section...Yes, it's stupid.
2007-12-29 19:31:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by fifimsp3 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
yes and a dumb state
2007-12-30 01:01:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by must<3dogs 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well, ppl name their little ones after cities and states all the time; afterall way back when these places were first named after someone to begin with.
2007-12-29 12:22:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by u r s i 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
I don't think it's dumb.....just not a good name for a person.
2007-12-29 12:23:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by ZEE 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
Yes, but there are worse names.
2007-12-29 12:22:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by Sam Adams 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Not for a state.....
2007-12-29 12:23:24
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋