English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

what will be the time frame after she takes her oath that she will reverse these so called fascist Bush policies.

A) one day
B) one week
C) one month
D) one year.
E) Never.

2007-12-29 12:07:19 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

14 answers

F) Whenever it would be the popular thing for her to do according to what the polls say.

2007-12-29 12:36:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

i think of it ought to win the white living house, on the situation that each and every of the adolescents in u.s. certainly circulate out and vote and there is not any ohio/florida/balloting device malfunction. i individually like Edwards out of the best 3 democratic applicants the excellent nevertheless. And on a ingredient word: i'm curious as to why you may help Giuliani or McCain yet no longer Hillary or Obama? All 4 of those are notably reasonable applicants and generally stand for comparable issues. And as you declare to be a liberal, i could assume you could actually choose for the truly greater left leaning of the 4, no longer the main appropriate leaning ones. i do no longer recommend this as an attack or something, only trustworthy-to-god interest.

2016-10-20 08:24:06 · answer #2 · answered by dotel 4 · 0 0

I like how you left out what the "fascist Bush policies" are so that people have no frame of reference in which to give an intelligent answer. A perfect arrangement for a Republican. Kudos.
There are many factors involved with the "Checks and Balances" type of government we have. It will depend upon how much support she gets from Congress-the Supreme Court (which has many Bush appointees from both Presidents) and untangling the mess she would be walking into.
That being said-and I do take offense to any woman being called a b*tch-my research at vote-smart.org has developed my interest in Edwards as well. He answered a "Political Courage" questioner-something other candidates failed to do. That shows "on the table" honesty. 8:)

2008-01-01 16:17:05 · answer #3 · answered by PrivacyNowPlease! 7 · 0 1

E
She would not do it and for those folks thinking that our troops are going to leave Iraq they need to wake up and smell the coffee.

We are NEVER leaving Iraq ever.
We have bases set up there already, huge bases and airports, new buildings going up.

So its a myth to say we are leaving Iraq. So when you hear the politicians saying that they are going to pull us out of Iraq don't be fooled. We are never ever leaving that hot peace of real estate.

I crack up laughing when I hear people shouting slogans at these rallys "Bring our troops home!" and hogwash like that.

We will always have troops there FOREVER. I have to shrug my shoulders in disbelief when Ron Paul and Edwards Obama and the anti-war bunch, vow to bring the troops back when they know while they are even speaking that, that this will never happen. We have bases there so we aint leaving.

What they will do is rotate the troops and show scenes of troops coming back but the media wont show the new ones going over there lol.

It is surprising how the media really has people fooled..I mean guys they really think the U.S. is going to leave Iraq lol poor innocent anti-war believers.

2007-12-29 12:27:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Since she voted for the ones that were presented to Congress to give the president extra powers, I would lean towards E. However, she has vowed to uphold the Constitution and not follow these policies if she becomes president stating that the president is not above the law.

http://www.boston.com/news/politics/2008/specials/CandidateQA/ClintonQA/

This link shows how all the candidates answered the same questions about the powers of the president. It is very interesting. Huckabee declined to answer these questions.

2007-12-29 12:25:51 · answer #5 · answered by BekindtoAnimals22 7 · 0 0

Hillary is no longer the front runner in Iowa, she is a distant 3rd place and loosing ground. She wont even win the democratic nomination, and you should focus your efforts on Edwards, a much better candidate. Edwards is the dems best shot at president, because he does not have near the baggage Obama and Hillary do.
If the dems nominate Hillary, she will do worse than Geraldine Ferraro did. Thats right, you probably never heard of her. She is the closest any woman has ever came to the white house except as first lady.

2007-12-29 12:19:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

There are no fascist Bush policies. We will be in Iraq no matter who wins the presidency.

E. Never

2007-12-29 12:28:32 · answer #7 · answered by Chainsaw 6 · 0 1

It's going to take years to undo the damage done by Bush and Co. It doesn't matter who sits in the White House.

And, it's going to be costly; for us, the taxpayers (huge, trillions of dollars in debt), lives of our soldiers - it's going to be rough when we pull the troops out of Iraq (Anyone remember Vietnam?).

It is going to take more than one presidential term to fix our broken country, our broken economy, our broken international relations.

Bush has practically wrecked us.....and it's going to take a long, long time to pull it all back together.

We will never be the same America again....

2007-12-29 12:21:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

However long it takes to take a poll. She will do whatever the poll says is popular. A lesson learned from her husband. A real "leader".

2007-12-29 13:05:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Ah, let's see...just how long has it taken George Bush and his neocon zombie army to create his grotesque policies?

2007-12-29 12:20:37 · answer #10 · answered by St. Hell 5 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers