Reading as:-
(1/2) x - 3 ≤ 1
x - 6 ≤ 2
x ≤ 8
2007-12-29 10:57:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by Como 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Remember that whatever you do to one side of an equation (or inequality) you need to do to both sides. And your goal is to isolate the x.
1/2x - 3 <= 1
Then you need to get the x by itself by adding 3 to each side.
1/2 x - 3 + 3 <= 1 + 3
1/2 x <= 4
Then you need to isolate the x by itself so you need to multiply by the reciprocal 2/1 (2) to get rid of the 1/2.
1/2 x * 2 <= 4 * 2
x <= 8
Go back and check by putting in 8 for x.
1/2 (8) - 3 <= 1
4 - 3 <= 1
1 <= 1
True. Correct.
You said your book says 2 <= x <= 8 ?
If so, then 1 would not work for x, correct? Let's try it.
1/2 (1) -3 <= 1
1/2 - 3 <= 1
-2 1/2 <= 1
True statement. But according to what your book says, 1 should not work. It appears to me your book is incorrect.
2007-12-29 10:43:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Chalkbrd 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
1/2x - 3 = 1
1/2x = 4
x = 2
The first step is to write it out. Then, you add three to each side so that the 3 on the left is cancelled out and 1 becomes 4. The next thing is divide 1/2 by 4 and you get 2. That leaves you with x = 2
2007-12-29 11:23:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Could it be your book uses Yahoo! Answers typing language?
1/2x - 3 ≤ 1
1/2x ≤ 4
2x ≥ 1/4
x ≥ 1/8
If you meant: (1/2)(x) - 3 ≤ 1...
x ≤ 8
-----
EDIT:
It turned out your book made a big mistake. If your book types just way it looked like here, it could've been possible that they were right. It turned out they weren't right for both cases.
2007-12-29 10:35:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by UnknownD 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
the book is right. you have to add three to both sides so you get 1/2x is less than or equal to 4. so then u divide both sides by 1/2 and 4 divided by 1/2 is 2!
2007-12-29 10:38:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by dramageek0117 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
yes x <= 8
2007-12-29 10:34:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by holdm 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hmm... I don't know. I got the same answer you got. x is less than or equal to 8.
2007-12-29 10:37:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Your answer is right; you can't really have an answer like the one in your book unless you have simultaneous inequalities(two inequalities).
2007-12-29 10:35:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by nightowl 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
1/2x - 3 <= 1
1/2x <= 4
x <= 8
Answer: Yes, you're right.
2007-12-29 16:55:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by Jun Agruda 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
in general your answer Right unless if there a condition
2007-12-29 10:43:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by eissa 3
·
0⤊
0⤋