...was attacked (in such a way that DWARFED the attacks on Pearl Harbour) more than 6 YEARS AGO.
And they STILL HAVEN'T captured the ONE GUY, that THEY PROCLAIM to be responsible for it.
How the F*** is that POSSIBLE?
[I'm trying to see how many EXCUSES I can get.]
2007-12-29 10:08:34 · 7 answers · asked by 1/6,833,020,409 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
The only reasonable answer is they don`t want to really catch him.
2007-12-29 10:18:10 · answer #1 · answered by Zombie 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Unfortunately we elected a President that wanted to finish the job Daddy started in 1991 but did not finish because he listened to the UN instead of America.
Secondly, the USA is not as tight knit as it once was. There are too many special interest groups that are more interested in what the government or country can give them than they are for supporting the country.
Thirdly we are much more liberal and condoning of stuff than we used to be say back in the 40s. I would safely say if that attack had happened on Sept 11, 1950, Harry Truman would have nuked someone off of the face of the earth.
Unless we get back to thinking the way we did in the 1940s, then I am afraid we will continue to simply be just a big ole bunch of pùssies.
In addition, the one thing we need to do is start using home grown energy in the forms of:
1. Nuclear Power Plants
2. Ethanol
3. Bio-diesel
4. Solar and Wind
etc.
The minute we become a nation that is energy independent, and STOP buying Arab oil, then that is the minute we can tell all of them to go straight to hell and advise them if they continue to mess with us, we will do to them what Harry did to Japan in August 1945.
2007-12-29 10:19:12 · answer #2 · answered by cat_lover 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It is simple. Osama Bin Laden is a *****. How could you consider yourself a leader of a movement running and hiding?
How can you say you will defeat a country when you always retreat when the enemy is at the gate? How are you the fearless leader of a holy war (supposedly with Muhammad on your side) at the same time never appearing in public to address your following?
Osama is no leader, just a coward. He should take a lesson from Bhutto she was a real leader against all threats and attempts at her life she led her flock and was willing to die for her people, her beliefs and her country.
2007-12-29 10:33:28 · answer #3 · answered by nu_thug_hybridization 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
finding him is very hard, he's got endless resources so he's not just "some guy" he's the leader of many of you world's biggest terrorist organizations and he knows what he is doing
also, do you really think killing bin laden is going to do anything?
is catching and killing him going yo bring back the 9/11 victims?
no
is killing Osama going to end Muslim extremism?
no, it will probably make then even more mad at the US
could bin laden be easily replaced as the leader?
yes, the 2nd..3rd...4th....5th........ guy in command guy will just take over
i say that the US should prioritize it's resources to prevent futher terorrist attacks and not to tyr to settle an old score
after the US tries and hangs bin laden terrorist attacks will some fallow
what's the point in spending all our money in catching/killing some guy that was 6000 miles away from New York and the pentagon during 9/11???
2007-12-29 10:26:11 · answer #4 · answered by surgeshamray 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i think of it must be argued that countries like India have been hindered by utilising colonialism. Its boost wasn't related to British rule, yet only after it embraced capitalism. you need to declare the unfold of capitalism by utilising the British and individuals replaced into truly what created lots wealth interior the international.
2016-10-20 08:06:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Finding 1 person in a deep cave in huge mountain chains is not as easy at it sounds
2007-12-29 10:15:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
You tell me
2007-12-29 10:13:03 · answer #7 · answered by derek w 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋