in Michigan? The parents have done no wrong
2007-12-29 09:56:43 · 8 answers · asked by julie w 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Clarify, a whole lot before we can answer
2007-12-29 09:59:01 · answer #1 · answered by wantajeannie 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
If my son wanted to leave the family home at 17 I would not allow it unless he was legally emancipated so HE would be responsible for anything that he did.
2007-12-29 11:31:02 · answer #2 · answered by Ryan's mom 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A 17 year old cannot move unless given parental consent. If parents to give consent they are still responsible for the minor unless he/she is emancipated. If the parents are unsure minor will stay out of trouble they should not allow him/her to leave
2007-12-29 10:12:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yeah I dont understand your question. In the state of Kansas a parent cannot kick a child out until they are 18 and if the child leaves they are classified as a runaway and may either go into foster care, if it is deemed the parents fault, or to juvee if the kid is just being a brat.
2007-12-29 10:06:56 · answer #4 · answered by KassiJ 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes, we need specifics to give you a valid answer. What are the parents being responsible for? If the child moves out, and is legally on their own what did they do that the parents need to fix?
2007-12-29 10:02:15 · answer #5 · answered by Gypsy 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
In Texas, a 17 year old is a legal adult.
2007-12-29 09:59:11 · answer #6 · answered by justanotherone 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Sure seams like there are some underling questions to resolve here. First of all in Most states someone is not an adult until they reach the age of 18years old.
Remove them selfs? You mean they ran away? Man who hasn`t
2007-12-29 10:05:54 · answer #7 · answered by Big Deal Maker 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
2008 is going to be my year thats for sure
I 'm turning 17!!!
2007-12-29 10:00:08 · answer #8 · answered by -slayer 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋