English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I haven't seen anyone.
And I find that very strange, because millions of people in Pakistan who know the situation very well seem to believe this.
But nobody in the U.S. media will discuss it.
Interesting.

2007-12-29 09:38:55 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

Maybe Louis. But it didn't stop anyone from immediately declaring that the "terrorists" did it.

2007-12-29 09:43:07 · update #1

If "al Qaeda" is being controlled by the Pakistani security services, then "al Qaeda" already has nuclear weapons.

2007-12-29 09:45:52 · update #2

9 answers

It is extremely unlikely that Musharraf had Bhutto killed.

Musharraf is an excellent coalition builder, especially when his hold on power is threatened. A coalition with Benazir Bhutto was the only way that Musharraf could solidify his hold on power.

Although Musharraf is not up for reelection until October of 2012, the Pakistani Parliament could strip him of much of his power as the President and Chief of State.

Without the backing of Benazir Bhutto's supporters, Musharraf does not have a large enough group of supporters to prevent the Parliament of striping him of most of his powers.

With respect to who really did kill Benazir Bhutto: Al Qaida claimed responsibility almost immediately after her assasination. When Al Qaida claims responsiblity for an action they usually are the ones who are responsible.

Benazir Bhutto was hated by The Taliban, Al Qaida, the tribal warlords and the rest of the Muslim extremists in Pakistan because she was a woman and she had vowed to stamp out their influence in Pakistan and turn Pakistan into a secular state.

Benazir Bhutto was a serious threat to them, in particular because she had formed a coalition with Musharraf to share power, with Musharraf as the President and Chief of State and Benazir Bhutto as the Prime Minister.

It was a certainty that Benazir Bhutto would be elected Prime Minister in the January 8 elections.

None of the factions, the Talibam, Al Qaida, the tribal warlords, and the other Muslim extremists could afford to let her be elected and take power.

That is the reason that they had her killed.

2007-12-29 10:03:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Well, its beautiful seen Musharaf had Bhuto killed, is not it? Sure,the triggerman (suicide bomber) was once a terrorist. But appear on the tips--Musharaf does not use his navy to combat the terrorists, he makes use of it to assault and overwhelm professional-democracy activists and firms. And the terrorists do not goal Musharaf or hiis cornies--they have got been attacking the professional-democracy motion. And while they've--has Musharaaf retaliated in opposition to the terrorists? No--he declared a state of emergency--and arrested participants of the professional-democracy motion, close don the unfastened press, broke up protests, and positioned Bhuto beneath condo arrest. Face the tips: Musharaf isn't an best friend of the US--he's an best friend of al-Qaida. He ordered Bhuto murdered, they usually implemented the hit.

2016-09-05 14:04:45 · answer #2 · answered by lugar 1 · 0 0

Olbermann may have touched on it, but the rest of US. mainstream media were sure it was Al-Qaeda before any shot was fired.

Benazir Bhutto herself left a message with CNN, only to be opened in the event of death, that if she were killed Musharraf would be to blame.
After the first assassination attempt her security detail, provided by Musharraf, was reduced in size.

2007-12-29 09:45:11 · answer #3 · answered by . 5 · 3 1

All this conspiracy theory junk just serves to allow al Qaeda to take over Pakistan and get control of nuclear weapons. There are certainly those who want this to occur, but can't yet understand the consequences.

2007-12-29 09:44:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

I have heard "hints"; maybe not directly but his lack of attention to safety and security. I think the media is holding back waiting at least to find out what actually killed her. There have been so many versions, it will probably take an unbiased commission to further investigate.

2007-12-29 09:42:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

I would most believe the ones who had it happen in their own backyard.

The fact that the MSM here in the US hasn't touched on it, at least not in depth, does not surprise me.

2007-12-29 09:49:52 · answer #6 · answered by MassLass 4 · 0 3

Do you have any proof?
Were you there.How can you not say it was those islamo-facists,we already know the track record of those scum.

2007-12-29 09:52:45 · answer #7 · answered by ak6702 7 · 1 1

no although i think its possible that either side did or they acted in concert or some third party

2007-12-29 09:47:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Who cares!

2007-12-29 09:48:29 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

fedest.com, questions and answers