when the Dems do this?
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/12/28/vermont.banning.bush.ap/index.html?eref=rss_topstories
2007-12-29 09:16:00 · 17 answers · asked by Yahoo Answer Angel 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I would not want to be the police officer who had to confront the secret service detail of George Bush or Dick Cheney to make the arrest.
I would not want to be the town attorney who authorized the arrest of George Bush or Dick cheney.
I would not want to be a city council person who voted for a measure to arrest George Bush or Dick Cheney.
Such a move to arrest George Bush or Dick Cheney would probably be illegal and would probably subject any person involved to substantial legal liablility, from the city council persons who vote for the measure, to the city attorney who drafts the measure to the police officer who attempts to make the arrest.
The people who are behind this are acting in a very foolish manner.
This is not the way to handle the problem with this administration.
2007-12-29 09:33:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Wow, considering the po dunk little town has no jurisdiction in federal matters, I hope they do try to arrest him, everyone that signed that list would then be an accessory to a denial of civil rights and false arrest charge.
2007-12-29 09:45:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Depends. Did they commit war crimes?
Oh wait, Bill did, didn't he, by bombing a pharmaceutical factory in Sudan that made half the country's medicine and led to the preventable deaths of thousands of people.
And Bill's insistence on keeping sanctions on Iraq after it destroyed its WMD led to the preventable deaths of a million people. Crime against humanity, anyone?
So to answer your question: no the extreme right should not do this. Everyone should do this.
2007-12-29 09:24:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
maximum of those welfare human beings interior the crimson states do no longer vote in any respect or they vote for democrats. eighty% of the "united states of america's gross sales" as you call it rightfully belongs back interior the palms of the electorate no longer interior the government's hand.
2016-10-09 09:37:49 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not sure what your point is. Bush is a war criminal. The Clintons are ordinary citizens. Did the clintons start the war in Iraq? Are they the ones that set up the torture chambers? Am I missing something here?
2007-12-29 09:26:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Priscilla, Clinton wasn't impeached over a BJ.
He was impeached for lying about it under oath. Remember "I did not have sexual relatons with that woman"?
As for war crimes, WHAT war crimes?
2007-12-29 09:54:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. It is a meaningless exercise in futility and we should spend our time on more constructive things. Vindictiveness is counter productive.
2007-12-29 09:29:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think they would have a hard time enforcing it. No leader can when a popularity contest, but we still have more freedoms that a lot of countries.
2007-12-29 09:22:16 · answer #8 · answered by Danny 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
No, neither side should do it. But so called experts claim that dirty politics works. If true, it's we, the voters, who are at fault by letting it "work."
2007-12-29 09:24:37 · answer #9 · answered by golfer7 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Vermont is strange. They like to think they're such perfect liberals,but Vermont is one of the whitest states.
2007-12-29 09:22:28 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋