I mean this is AMERICA where the women are supposed to be the cutest in the world, although I am peritcular to chinese women, but that's beside the point. shouldn't if she ever becomes the first female president who is going to represent us be super fine like Mrs. America or some hot babe? instead of this nasty mutt that's trying to be our president?
2007-12-29 09:06:12 · 13 answers · asked by Whoooa Mule 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
That's not a nice thing to say about the possible "First Dog".
2007-12-29 09:10:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Only if the men are also chosen for their looks. We could just elect by an internet/telephone vote like American Idol. It could be televised like the Miss America contest. Swimsuit, evening gown/tux, talent, and the one question to determine if they have a brain to go with the looks. Mr/Ms congeniality would also be a plus for foreign policy. What a great idea. Think of the money that would be saved. The best dental work wins. Hopefully, it never comes to that.
2007-12-29 17:32:20 · answer #2 · answered by BekindtoAnimals22 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Perticular? Would you mean Particular?
Why would it matter if she was good looking or not? Margaret Thatcher was one very smart woman who knew alot about political policies, but wasn't much to look at. We need someone who will do a good job, and unfortunately, the brightest are not usually the most beautiful.
Abe Lincoln, one of our most successful Presidents was anything but good looking. In fact, he was almost downright ugly. But he was smart and a no nonsense, fearless leader. He was also very much hated at the time that he was alive, but history got it right and saw him for the great man that he was.
2007-12-29 17:12:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Looks have nothing to do with being president. I'll vote for candidates who I think will do a good job, no matter how ugly they look. I believe this kind of superficial thinking is a large part of why America is having as many problems as it does. Too many people with a good image and no substance are reaching positions of power.
2007-12-29 17:20:16 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, that's not really a qualification. But lets not be foolish to be elected you're going to have to reach a minimum level of looks or its not going to happen. I don't think the Hildebeast makes it.
Another democrat Geraldine Ferraro I think did exceed the minimum. But she was shackled to a communist surrender monkey. If not she I think could have won on her own.
2007-12-29 17:27:18 · answer #5 · answered by Roadkill 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Looks shouldn't matter. Leadership, honesty and intelligence should matter.
I would vote for a woman for president, but not Hillary Clinton. Not because of her physical appearance, but because I totally disagree with her platform.
2007-12-29 17:26:49 · answer #6 · answered by nowyouknow 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't care if she is trans-gendered with burns on her face. I want the president to have a libertarian view of the role of government.
This is why I don't support any democrats.
2007-12-29 17:21:04 · answer #7 · answered by MP US Army 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary Clinton, Oprah Winfrey and Condoleeza Rice are all good looking if ever they become as US President.
2007-12-29 17:10:17 · answer #8 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'm guessing you are giving us a little sarcasm or are not very old or not very smart. When someone is going to prevent nuclear disaster or crap being allowed into our food supply - she can look like Shrek's girlfriend as far as I care. A brain, please let her have a brain. (being able to pronounce nuclear also would be great)
2007-12-29 17:20:28 · answer #9 · answered by wildhorseracelover 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The cutest in the world? Aren't the majority in the U.S overweight? Well if thats your idea of "cute"....
2007-12-29 17:09:47 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋