I've decided that only I will decide what is right and wrong for me. Do you think this is wise, or is this ignorant?
2007-12-29 08:58:12 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
I think it is very wise to decide for your self as long as you aren't breaking any laws! I also follow my heart on what I know to be the right thing to do!
2007-12-29 15:54:32 · answer #1 · answered by Me 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't let the status quo decide what is right and wrong for me. I obey the law, and sometimes I don't even agree with THAT. Society has absolutely no influence on me in that regards, except that by saying something is "wrong," it causes me to question whether or not it actually is, because the status quo is very often "wrong" by prescribing morality for others.
2007-12-29 09:02:00 · answer #2 · answered by Mickey Mouse Spears 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think everyone makes their own set of moral guidelines to some extent. There are obviously things that society influences, but there are plenty of people who go against the grain and make their own rules about what is good and bad. Essentially every human has the same basic moral foundation, it's just the variations that are individual.
2007-12-29 09:01:52 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I decide of course I will be open to listen to what society has to say but I will always do what I believe is right...
2007-12-29 09:05:00 · answer #4 · answered by Sephiroth~The One Winged Angel~ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't let society decide anything for me, cause our society is completely F--ked up! I decide myself by using common sense, my spiritual and moral background(upbringing) and of course I also go by the law.
2007-12-29 09:05:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I decide. I don't let anyone decide for me.
Heck they could be the ones who are wrong.
2007-12-29 09:01:58 · answer #6 · answered by bwmorency 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I decide. I think it's wise, because society can be pretty fcked up.
2007-12-29 09:03:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Our device is set up for majority rule with minority rights. There are regulations proscribing what the regulation can dictate in the habit of others. besides, once you're speaking relating to the U. S., a minimum of, *what* religious majority? there could be a majority of a minimum of nominal Christians in this us of a, yet somebody like my liberal Presbyterian mom is totally in assessment to, say, your commonplace ultraconservative Bible-belt Republican. I doubt you're able to be able to desire to discover a real majority of anybody set of religious ideals in, nicely, maximum democratic countries. And, besides, theocracy has a tendency to make for undesirable government *and* undesirable faith. edit: i'm going to offer you some examples of why the minority could desire to be waiting to, a minimum of in some constrained respects, dictate to the final public. could that's ideas-blowing if the poorest 60% of the inhabitants desperate to kill the richest 5%, to distribute their wealth? Or could that be merciless and finally unfavorable? could that's ideas-blowing for an ethnic majority to settle on that conserving individuals of a particular ethnic minority as slaves became a useful area of do? Or could that be unfair and grossly uncivilized? If men have been the final public of the inhabitants, could that's ideas-blowing for them to be waiting to make regulations that stripped women folk of the main ideas-blowing to possess assets? Or could that be unjust and beside the point? If the final public of the inhabitants ate meat, could that's ideas-blowing for them to make regulations saying that vegetarians could no longer carry public workplace? Or could that be a intense infringement on own liberty? could any of those examples be to any extent further merely, to any extent further honest, to any extent further useful, in case you substituted the folk listed in them with religious communities? there is not any longer something saying that the regulations will no longer be able to mirror the final values of the final public, religious or otherwise. even nonetheless it is inherent in any useful and merely democracy that there are protections against the tyranny of the final public--against the "public will" getting used to strip away substantial deepest, individual rights.
2016-10-02 13:28:45 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You decide but be open to suggestions.
2007-12-29 09:01:39 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think your decision shows that you are maturing. I didn't start doing that until I began growing up.
2007-12-29 09:03:51 · answer #10 · answered by Mandy--relatively harmless 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋