What Suggests So?
2007-12-29 08:22:49 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
In Power & Greed With Humans In Particular Politician Anything is Possible
Knowing What I Know Nothing Would Surprise Me Anymore With Politicians,
Most Especially From a Army (Oops Ex Army) General That Believes That He Has The Right to Take Over the Country and Do As He Pleases Regardless Whether He Is Right Or Wrong or Whether is Good for The Country or The People.
In My Books Any Army General In Any Country That Mounts A Coup for Whatever Reasons (Except For Removing a Foreign Power) Is A Traitor To His People And His Country
Knowing & Accepting This Then We Are Dealing With A Traitor And More Importantly US Has Trusted, Backed And Founded A Traitor
I Think That Says It All
2007-12-30 10:04:58 · answer #1 · answered by raffaele1111 3 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Both ends against the middle? He's not only keeping his head, he's profiting immensely. Bhutto was a dead woman the moment Bush helped engineer her return, and I wouldn't give too many odds on any opposition with his stranglehold and al-Qaeda's less than veiled support while he's got everyone chasing their tails with no access to their strongholds inside Musharraf's Pakistan.
2007-12-30 09:40:46 · answer #2 · answered by Fr. Al 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, Musharraf is in cahoots with AQ; AQ stays in the mountaisn bordering Afghanistan and Musharraf doesn;t bother them and keeps the US out of the country in exchange for him keeping his head.
Hell, I guarantee you, Musharraf even has a hand at Bhutto's assasination.
Furthermore, we've propped up a lot of very evil people in the past, from the Shah in Iran to Noriega in Panama and Saddam in Iraq, only to have the bastards bite us in the @ss years down the road.
2007-12-29 08:37:00 · answer #3 · answered by sablelieger 4 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Has he been quiet about it?
It is the Bush Administration championing Musharraf as a great ally--despite the fact that everyone in the world believes Bin-laden is a quasi-permanent resident of Pakistan.
2007-12-29 08:35:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Politics is the sophisticated artwork of BACKSTABBING. they have now and continually will, do what's of their very own acceptable pastimes on the cost of the yank voters, that are purely respected till...they forged their vote. voters are disposable in the event that they could recruit new ones from the unlawful immigrant inhabitants. What those applicants are disturbingly ignorant of is that Mexico has in no way despatched it rather is acceptable or BRIGHTEST over our borders interior the lifeless of night. Obama, Clinton AND McCain are all on checklist as vote casting against making English our national language. final analysis-- 20 years later and the persons in ability are extra ANTI-American than ever. the thank you to kill the united states of a /
2016-11-26 01:41:41 · answer #5 · answered by Erika 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, for one thing he does not really go after al qeda in the mountains of pakistan, he is scared of them and the taliban and other religious zealots, and caved under pressure, while still trying to appease the U.S.He is truly stuck between a rock and a hard place.
2007-12-29 09:01:39 · answer #6 · answered by cheekydogg10 1 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I have no doubt. What other possible reason could he have for not wanting the US to enter Pakistan to find Bin Laden, if he is somewhere in that nations borders. If he has nothing to hide it shouldn't be a problem.
His reluctance to hold free elections is another good indication. I guess since his opposition is dead he doesn't have to worry about it now.
2007-12-29 08:43:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of Muslims.
The Shadow knows hahahahahahaha
2007-12-29 08:29:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Definitely a possibility.
Although, why play that game? The consequences would be disastrous.
Besides, the US is paying for everything he needs. I would be surprised. Perhaps its someone(s) in his administration?
2007-12-29 09:06:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
An other theoretic angle is after supplying all that money and support to defeat the xUSSR in Afghanistan it is even chances that he is pro Taliban, certainly anti feminist but pro US, or anti US and anti Taliban, but certainly anti feminist. Does that still make him a suspect Bhutto's death? you bet.
2007-12-29 14:06:05 · answer #10 · answered by Psyengine 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋