at least one game home and away against the other 25 teams out of division, plus 8 games (4 home, 4 away) against the 4 intra-division teams.
Comments, anyone?
2007-12-29 08:19:55 · 5 answers · asked by MDCSWildcats1986 2 in Sports ➔ Hockey
The idea you have was one of the finalists, and most of the owners picked yours. Bettman convinced them to give the schedule that will be used for the next two years a chance a chance.
Personally, I wanted 82 games between Chicago and Detroit, but nobody outside of Chicago wanted that!
2007-12-29 09:08:09 · answer #1 · answered by Like I'm Telling You Who I A 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
What the **** have you been smoking? That's this schedule but worse!
Here's what I think should happen:
-home and home against the opposing conference (30 games)
-5 games against the division (20 games)
-3 games against the non-division conference opponents (30 games)
-2 extra games against in conference teams based on position in their respective divisions (1s face 1s, 2s face 2s, and so on)
2007-12-29 08:33:32 · answer #2 · answered by trombass08 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
8 is IMO too many for intra division. 6 is more appropiate. Also, I think you should play your conference more than the other.
Don't like yours and like the NHL's new one better.
2007-12-29 08:25:18 · answer #3 · answered by Bob Loblaw 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The schedule they implement next year should be just fine. But even this won't make everyone happy.
2007-12-29 08:28:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yeah, I agree with Bob...8 is too many. 6 sounds better.
2007-12-29 08:28:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋