2007-12-29 08:05:41 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football (American)
No
2007-12-29 08:08:27 · answer #1 · answered by RWB4646 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope, quite a number city's group has in no way even performed a large Bowl at its very own field. the two examples of the l. a. Rams and San Fransico 40 9'ers have been performed in or close to the comparable city, yet no longer in thier very own stadium. This twelve months should not be any diverse. The large Bowl is in Miami and the Dolphins did no longer make the playoffs. next twelve months's large Bowl is in New Orleans.
2016-11-26 01:39:24 · answer #2 · answered by butlin 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. The Rams played in the Rose Bowl in 1979, and the 49ers played at Stanford (just down the road) in 1984.
2007-12-29 08:21:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
no usually they choose a stadium of a team that isn't doing to well
this is for two reasons
first so that no team going to the Superbowl will have home field advantage
second because the teams and cites who aren't doing so well can really use the extra income the Superbowl will bring
but this isn't the only reason they use to pick the site
they will often host a Superbowl if a new stadium is built that's why Dallas will host in a few years
2007-12-29 08:22:47 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
49ers came close in 1985 when the game was at Stanford (Palo Alto), California.
2007-12-29 08:13:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
When the Rams were in L.A. they played and lost to Pittsburgh in Pasadena,CA, pretty close.
2007-12-29 08:15:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
frisco was the closest a few years back in palo alto ?
2007-12-29 08:12:02 · answer #7 · answered by chaaalie 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
came close, but no cigar
2007-12-29 08:12:31 · answer #8 · answered by VGpugs 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nope, was close several times.... but no.
2007-12-29 08:09:45 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
noq.
2007-12-29 08:08:33 · answer #10 · answered by BulldogBlitz 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋