English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I would ...it sounds like these guys really want JUSTICE on all the lies that this current administration has told us for the past 7 years. Someone needs to pay for all the damage this guys have caused to the United States and to all the other countries we have occupied.

2007-12-29 07:24:17 · 15 answers · asked by Cool guy 2 in Politics & Government Politics

15 answers

Not even if they were the last 2 candidates on the ticket..

I'd write in myself first........

2007-12-29 07:37:48 · answer #1 · answered by I Can Count To Potato 7 · 0 0

Frankly... No... (lemme explain). If elected, that ticket (although I'd put Kucinich on top) would be the lamest of lame-duck tickets. Honestly, they're TOO principled to get anything done in office. Congress would never write any bills they asked for, and they would VETO every bill congress DID right because they'd be too full of pork. So... nothing would ever get done (do you really think a bill to abolish the IRS, or legalize pot would make it past the floor??). As it is, we have WAY too much polarization... So far, Bush has used 7 vetos. And they've all been in the past ONE YEAR... Simply put, he can't work across the aisle. What we REALLY need in order to make things better for the country is a REAL moderate. That's the only way... The founding fathers set up a system of checks and balances to ensure cooperation between parties.... It ain't working right now because the administration is headed by children. It wouldn't work with Kicinich/Paul because there would be no compromise.

2007-12-29 07:32:58 · answer #2 · answered by Fretless 6 · 0 0

To those who think Dennis wouldn't go for it... Dennis is actually the one who's brought this idea up. I'll be back with a link.

Here: http://tailrank.com/3944993/

Here's a little analysis:
Kucinich, the Cleveland congressman running in a longshot bid to become president, suggested it himself Sunday.

“I’m thinking about Ron Paul” as a running mate, Kucinich told a crowd of about 70 supporters at a house party here, one of numerous stops throughout New Hampshire over the Thanksgiving weekend. A Kucinich-Paul administration could bring people together “to balance the energies in this country,” Kucinich said.

I suppose I know what Kucinich means, but serious presidential hopefuls generally don’t consider running mates with whom they disagree on almost everything, including fundamental beliefs about the size, scope, and power of the government.

And as it turns out, Ron Paul wouldn’t even consider it.


“Dr. Paul and Rep. Kucinich are friends and there is a lot of mutual respect,” Paul communications director Jesse Benton said in an e-mail when asked whether a running-mate spot on the Kucinich ticket would be attractive to Paul. “They have worked, and will continue to work, together on ending the war and protecting civil liberties.

“However, Ron wants to substantially cut the size and scope of the federal government. There are too many differences on issues such as taxes and spending to think a joint ticket would be possible.”

Granted, Paul and Kucinich appear to largely agree on national security matters, including the war in Iraq and the Patriot Act. But then, there’s everything else.

Presidential candidates, when considering running mates, are supposed to eye those who agree with them on the future. Ideally, the two would be partners, aiming for the same goals.

Kucinich wants a bigger government; Paul wants a smaller one. Kucinich wants the feds to play a much larger role in everything from healthcare to education to retirement security; Paul wants to the feds to play no role in these issues whatsoever, and privatize as much as humanly possible. Kucinich is pro-choice, Paul is pro-life. Sounds like a match made in … somewhere unpleasant.

Sure, they’re both on the outside looking in when it comes to their respective parties, but that’s not exactly a recipe for a coherent presidential ticket — Dennis Kucinich and Ron Paul are opposites.

That Kucinich claims to be a liberal champion while considering a running mate who would eliminate most of the government is a head scratcher. They're both honest and wonderful men, but their social principles are too different to work together, but if they did and it did work, it could be the best of both worlds.

2007-12-29 07:32:29 · answer #3 · answered by TJTB 7 · 2 0

Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich had excellent views on critical issues but they are not provided the exposure by media as compared to Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.

2007-12-29 08:13:08 · answer #4 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 1 0

No. Ron Paul is a racist gay hating antisemitic nutjob. When asked what one of his big ideas, ending the income tax would cost he couldn't answer. He voted NO on a nation wide AMBER alert and the Neo Nazis love him.

Kucinich is a great candidate. I could imagine voting for him if he had a chance to win. He and Ron Paul have no business running together seeing most of their ideas are contradictory. Stormfront is behind the Ron Paul Revolution. David Duke, former Grand Wizard of the KKK, is a fan and has endorsed Ron Paul. Are you willing to stand with them?

Dennis Kucinich is one of the only left wing voices in America and with Gravel the only real left wing candidate for the white house. Ron Paul is far right. They have nothing in common except their opposition to the Iraq war

2007-12-29 07:37:37 · answer #5 · answered by justgoodfolk 7 · 0 2

i grew to become into thinking approximately that when you asked my question. they could have the skill to tug in a undeniable quantity, yet how lots. additionally the two party gadget could be on extreme attack mode. thinking it used to take 4 years to vote them out and then 2 and as of previous due 11 months, the individuals in simple terms ought to get ill sufficient of all of it. yet then the great time funds is at the back of the two party gadget. you will discover that n the $3.7 billion* that the lobbyists and others donated to the homestead and Senate contributors in 2009. yet exciting. contemplate whether they could pull like Perot and be a spoiler or ought to garner greater.

2016-10-20 07:31:33 · answer #6 · answered by derverger 4 · 0 0

A conservative with one of the most liberal democrats running. Can't say I would. But I hope whoever gets the democratic ticket chooses Kucinich as a VP.

2007-12-29 07:40:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Yes I will and I will not for the others, why do all the others have to lie just to get votes, they go to different parts of our country and change there minds to suit the wants of different areas.

2007-12-29 07:30:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

No:
I want to avoid any canidate with a vast conspiracy theroy about this current administration. I just don't trust those kind of people.

2007-12-29 07:30:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

They are both the looney candidate of their respective parties. You think we have problems now if either of them were to be elected we may as well kiss our country goodbye.

2007-12-29 07:42:38 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers