Who believes Al-Qaeda was responsible for Bhutto's death?

Question

You can be sure that Al-Qaeda was not responsible as they have categorically denied it.....

You can be sure that Bhutto's party the PPP, have said that they do not accept the 'official' explanations.....

Didn't Ms. Bhutto herself PUBLICLY accuse the same Interior Ministry of an attempt to assasinate her in October..?

MURKY, MURKY, MURKY......

arkainis... Maybe you too young to understand what Terrorist Organizations do... They jump at the chance to claim International calamities.. NOT DENY THEM.

Answer 1

I think al Qaeda is becoming the favored bogeyman to blame when an assassination or suicide bombing takes place. Bhutto was SHOT, and then the assailant blew himself up, along with 20 or so other people. There's something we don't know, I"m sure of it.

Answer 2

It is hilarious that the Bush Administration has not been screaming bloody hell about any suggestion that A-Q was behind the assassination.

And here is why:

• Bush has repeatedly championed Musharraf as his ally-buddy in the War on Terror; and he has specifically praised the Pakistan leader’s cooperation in combating A-Q.

• Bhutto was campaigning against Musharraf—and, therefore, against the Bush and Musharraf war on A-Q.

• According to Bush-logic (if you are not with us then you are against us) therefore, by not standing with the Bush-Musharraf team, Bhutto must have been standing with the A-Q team.

• But, if A-Q killed Bhutto that would imply that A-Q was siding with Bush-Musharraf; supporting the opinion of many (including the US State Department and America’s Intelligence community) that Bush has been the best thing that ever happened to A-Q and every other anti-Western terrorist organization.

Why isn’t Bush denying the implied positive relationship between his Administration and Al-Qaeda?

Answer 3

It is hard to determine who is responsible for Bhutto Death.

It could have been Musharraf, because Bhutto was jeopardizing his chances for remaining official president of Pakistan. On the other hand, it could have been Al-Qaeda. What is the best way to throw a country that was on the edge of civil war into complete unrest? Kill a prominent leader and make it look like a conspiracy. Al-Qaeda may be playing these bleeding hearts like puppets in order to gain control of Pakistan and its nukes.

One thing I know America had nothing to do with this. Musharraf is considered American ally we would not assassinated an opposition leader knowing it could cause a coup to replace him. Bhutto was strongly against AL-Qaeda and promised to rid her country of them. America loved the power-sharing plan that Bhutto and Musharraf was in talks of doing. No matter who became leader of Pakistan both had, interest more aligned with the U.S. then Al-Qaeda. We had no reason Political, nor Military wise to assassinated Bhutto.

I am not a bush fan, but it is sick how everyone always blames America for everything that happens in the world. Anti-Americanism is at all time high, mainly because of Bush policies but blaming us for this is a little extreme. I guess when Castro finally dies America will be blame for poisoning his cigar.

Answer 4

Musharraf all the way. Read his history. A-Q has become a scapegoat for everything that comes down the pike, and it's so easy to point the finger at them ( or anyone else, for that matter). Power is a funny thing. Those who can't resist it immediately place themselves in jeopardy because somebody or some group is going to feel threatened by their ideas/presence. If survival of the fittest is a reality...stay out of the limelight, blend into the wall, don't make a difference!

Answer 5

no. this hit came from the power structure within pakistan. Ms Bhutto was the opposition. her stated agenda was to clean out the dirt of the pakistan government; she was not a playa' in george bush's war of terror in the middle east. which brings up another interesting perspective... .

Answer 6

I do ....they have also claimed to have done it....
You can cast all the innuendos you want but your history of scum terrorist support speaks for itself..
They did not want a Woman or a Friendly to the US in office...they had the motive they used one of their favorite methods and took responsibility at first......them after seeing the repercussions they are NOW denying it.....
The only things Murky here....is the SPEW that you and your kind are putting out to now shift the blame elsewhere

Answer 7

Suicide bombers are not easy to come by unless you have a fanatic cause or religion to draw recruits from. To the best of my knowledge that leaves out the U.S., Israel and Musharraf.

In this case a denial would gain more for them than claiming it. Very murky indeed.

It is a rather important issue. I believe it was Islamic radicals whether Al Qaeda or not. If it can be tied to Al Qaeda then we may be able to gain enough support in the country to go after the Taliban and Al Qaeda there.

Musharraf has too much to loose by allowing it to happen and be tied to him.

Answer 8

This assasination allows Pakistan to get ANOTHER few BILLION dollars in anti-terrorism funding. Were talking 10 Billion (10,000 Million) taxpayer dollars. All over 1 death.

Al Queda did NOT do it.

Answer 9

I think the Pakistan government were very very quick to come out with an explanation.

I'm with you, I wouldn't be surprised if there are some very shocking revelations coming out about this one.

Answer 10

Al Qaeda is proud they killed Mrs. Bhutto. Nothing murky.