It looks like GW vetoed the defense budget to protect the interests of corporate contractors at the expense of U.S. troops.
2007-12-29 06:05:07 · 9 answers · asked by poet1b 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The people who claim special understanding and knowledge of these things always kill. Sure it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, bu your ignorance about ducks is unbelievable.
Clinton and Feinstein didn't veto the defense budget that was supposed to be so important to complete on time to give the troops well deserved raises and keep the war effort going.
2007-12-29 06:57:01 · update #1
That sounds like a good explanation to me.
2007-12-29 06:08:10 · answer #1 · answered by Sean 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I heard that the Iraqi government were pulling money out of the US because there was a clause in the bill that stated that pows from the first war could sue Iraq and the government (Iraq) put pressure on Bush to veto it and he did
2007-12-29 06:12:46 · answer #2 · answered by ? 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
that's unhappy the way you libs fail to examine the complete tale and in simple terms SPEW from headlines... He VETOED it to maintain the elected Gov of Iraq sturdy. without this there could have been hundreds of proceedings right here interior the suggested directed on the instant Gov there for the attrocities of Saadam. yet then you relatively want a techniques that makes use of excellent judgment and not in elementary terms emotion...it is the place the libs lack...
2016-10-20 07:17:29 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ask Diane Finstien D. (Husband's company has record profit from Iraq) and the big one George Soro's (Share holder in Haliburton) and chief financier of the Clinton Campaign and the DNC....looks like they have more to profit from...so which part is owned by the rich.
2007-12-29 06:12:58 · answer #4 · answered by garyb1616 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Corporate interests once again.
And its sad the way you will get hate-filled answers from the little robots, all because you are exposing an American president who is actively defying the will of his own people.
2007-12-29 06:10:42 · answer #5 · answered by Zinger! 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I'd have to say he's looking out for ALL THREE.
God Bless that man. Does he ever find time to even sleep?
2007-12-29 06:22:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You ignorance on this subject is utterly amazing.
2007-12-29 06:21:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I have decided that no matter what Bush does, to you guys, it will be the wrong thing, so I give up, go ahead and say what ever you want to.
2007-12-29 06:08:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
you know where i would like to shove that veto pen??!!!
2007-12-29 06:09:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋