does the physics of a pancake collapse vs a pile driver collapse, change the ability to explain squibs?

Question

The FEMA B-pad report explained the squibs in the collapse of the twin towers by using the physics of a pancake collapse. Later the NIST report claimed that FEMA had been wrong, and in fact it was a pile driver collapse that brought down the twin towers. This changes the physics of the collapse. Then later in there report, NIST addressed the squibs by simple referring you to the FEMA report. This seems to be inconsistent of rational logic
I am not positive about the details thus I am seeking those who better understand.

Answer 1

My question is regardless if it's a pancake or pile driver type collapse, then why did all 3 buildings experience a global collapse resulting in near free fall speeds symmetrically into their own footprint? Why did all 3 have molten metal underneath the rubble hundreds of degrees hotter than jet fuel burns weeks after 9/11? Hmm, inside job............ YES!!!

Answer 2

Great question! The NIST claim is correct and the Fema claim is also correct, and so is your and my observational claim that these buildings fell. Did you read any preventive solutions in any of the reports? Neither did I. How would you prevent the collapses, if those buildings were impacted the same way? Why isn't anyone trying to prevent buildings from collapsing? Wouldn't building collapses be a thing of the past, when a collapse-preventive measure becomes a part of the building design and assembly? Wouldn't the People inside of the building survive these kinds of impacts, be able to escape, and be rescued by the first responders? Wouldn't a terrorist bomber look pretty stupid when they bombed or ran a plane/car into a building and doesn't hurt anyone? The inconsistancies stem from that the Twin Towers were Engineered as three-compression-resistant designs in-one. They had a "Flagpole" inner column, a "Curtain-Wall" perimeter wall system, and a connecting horizontal floor/beam system, which were all rigid-materialed components, without any tension-resistance mechanism (swaying engineering does not include a frame tension-resistance device/mechanism, it is a theory based on the rigid-material components motion limitings.). So all three observations fit the collapse scenario of these buildings. The walls fell into the internal columns, the floor-beams pile-drived through the internal columns, and resulted into a pancake collapse of the entire triple-Engineered systems. For the type of frame system, size of structure, and NOT including a continuous tension-resistant frame mechanism, these buildings are still the best designed buildings ever, of these types. Remember, the terrorists could not bring down these buildings in 1993, and when these buildings did collapse, they collapsed inward, preventing loads of additional devestation.

This answer is based on my experience and training in Analytical Physics Observational Abilities. My opinions are not included because I was not in on the attacks, or on site personally during the rescue and recovery process. My feelings for the victims, workers, and responders are of normal grieving, condolences, and hope for better times. I too, was scared that my Country was under attack, and prayed, cried, got angry, etc; like most Americans and United States Supporters. I do not think that I can give a hypothesis of how the attacks came about, as I am not familiar with the attackers on a personal level. I believe that we can better protect ourselves from these kinds of attacks, and from weather and natural disaster-level storms, earthquakes, etc; with a new innovation in building and structure frame Continuous Reinforcing Systems, which were not in the Twin Tower or Pentagon Buildings, because these systems had not been developed until 2005-2006. They are developed now, and buildings can now be protected from these kinds of events, and I do believe that these systems can generate lots of new jobs, businesses, educational tools, and so on, meaning that this innovation might just be one of those "Golden Eggs" (hint-hint), that can have a positive place in our and additional societies. Randy Lee Dube.

Answer 3

the super rigidity of air moving at great speeds at angles that had by no skill been envisioned interior the form of the homes. the super rigidity of the commencing place being moved with the staggering impact of having hundreds of thousands of lots of two huge homes coming down right away. The wieght of the rubble pressing and compacting the earth around the principles of the development sending sysmic ask your self waves for the duration of the form. the issues that had existed, as in each elderly development, have been converted by utilizing a number of those aspects that had by no skill been envisioned whilst it exchange into built. And by utilizing the by utilizing, a number of those 'conspiracy theories' have been traced back to the middle-East Terror communities, in a divide and conquer propoganda campaign. The onus of evidence is on the conspiracy theorists and that they have got did no longer show something. the certainty stands that the suicide bombers created a concern of such destruction it had by no skill been experienced nor envisioned interior the form of those homes. NATO exchange into attacked.

Answer 4

Rosie O'Donnell has some theories on this matter, why don't you ask her?