I do. Clemens was named only coz Yankee trainer got indicted. Nobody from boston were interrogated so I am not surprised they rat out a bunch when and if their trainer got the feds on him.
2007-12-28 22:58:30 · 18 answers · asked by jasonpickles 3 in Sports ➔ Baseball
Yeah and his bloody sock was fake.
2007-12-29 00:34:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
doubtful. schilling's been a strong opponent of steroid users, very vocally that is. as for you calling him mediocre until 33, that's a complete crock. between 1996 and 1998 he never had an ERA greater than 3.25. that's ages 29 to 31. in 1992, at age 25 he had a 2.35. he was always a great arm and had great stuff, but once he found his command a little later in his career he really established himself as elite. he went from 63 walks in 1998 to 23 in 2003. you don't gain command from muscle mass either. so i think any talk of curt schilling using steroids is completely unsubstantiated.
2016-05-27 16:21:01 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I hate to tell you but there is no point of accusing Schilling if there is no such thing heard about it. Nobody can indicate Schilling has ever been involved with drugs.
You're probably a Yankee fan, and you don't like when maybe heroes are getting accused of things, but its true that Roger Clemens took steriods. There is no proof, but there is also proof, because people are not just going to accuse people of using steriods for no reason!
A lot of people are probably (maybe) going to ly about there thoughts cause they just want best answer. Almost everyone picks someone with the idea that they have. But really think about the facts you have of accusing this player and that.
How do you just get big??? Look at this picture please.
http://sports.aol.com/fanhouse/photos/the-mitchell-report/530669/
i want you to look start to finish and look at all those huge guys.
and then look at this: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/39/Curt_Schilling.jpg/357px-Curt_Schilling.jpg
this guy is not big.......
and in the 1st pictures i sent you alot of the guys are bald, Schilling not!
I think I've proven my case.
2007-12-29 14:29:23 · answer #3 · answered by red 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I would say anything is possible. I still say there should have been many more top caliber players on list. I never heard of 75% or more of them. I can't believe that since the accuasations of steroid use in baseball since the late 80's or early 90's & the Mitchell report comes up with only 86 or so players. I still say there are more players that are juiced that weren't on the report & I don't care what others say about it.
2007-12-29 01:45:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Schilling lost so much velocity off his fastball, and Clemens could still throw mid 90's last year!
100% NO!
2007-12-29 01:36:01 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Boston Irish has it right, there is nothing out there to indicate Schilling has ever been involved with drugs. The list is big enough as it is and none of us needs to add names of our own just because we don't like a player.
2007-12-28 23:28:51 · answer #6 · answered by Frizzer 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Who cares?* The government has more important things to worry about than baseball* I doubt most fans give a crap as long as they get to see the star players play* (Roids speed recovery from injury) and hit the ball a mile*
2007-12-29 02:14:50 · answer #7 · answered by Travis W 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I hate to break it to you but that simply isn't true. Curt never took steroids. Curt is overweight. In his new contract, it specifically says that he has to lose weight. Don't point your finger at someone just because, why? He's older and still plays well?
Yeah, there was a snitch that reported on others, it just so happens that the snitch is located in NY.
The Mitchell Report is what it is. Don't try to add your own names to the already embarrassing list.
2007-12-28 23:21:40 · answer #8 · answered by Boston_Irish 3 · 6⤊ 5⤋
Curt Shilling reminds me of Rosie O'Donnell, always shooting his mouth of about someone else but if you say something about him they get all defensive. I don't think either took steroids and neither had ankle surgery, Shilling spilled ketchup on his sock and they kept zooming in on it.
2007-12-29 07:04:34 · answer #9 · answered by Andy 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
what are you basing your charges on? no there is no way schilling took steroids, that is a very ridiculous, and dangerous thing to say
2007-12-29 01:40:39 · answer #10 · answered by denisgack 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
then your an idiot. notice that roger clemens was able to maintain his ability to throw 95... curt schilling was topping off at 89 this year. his velocity has steadily decreased since coming to boston. if he took roids he would at the least maintain. plus hes fat, roger is built.
2007-12-28 23:20:37 · answer #11 · answered by hp 3 · 4⤊ 4⤋