whos hand is behind butto"s murder?

Answer 1

Qui bono?

Who benefits most?

The Pakistani Army remained aloof, separate, and largely untouched by Mrs.Bhutto during both her terms in office. They have no fear nor great concern about her or her followers. (They also know intimately the details of her and her family's enormous profits gained during office.) If such fears about their power and independence were to arise, it would simply do as it always has done: declare martial law and rule directly.

There is a faction within the Army that allies itself with the fundamental Islamic leaders, who in turn the Army has funded and protected while it raises jihadist fighters. That faction has already made more, and more sophisticated attempts to murder the President.

Mrs.Bhutto and her supporters most of all, and including some Army officers, hold Western, secular values, and wish to see a modern, prosperous, law-abiding nation emerge in Pakistan.

All that is anathema to the values of Muslim fundamentals.

If some within the Army can be implicated, or thought to be
involved, in the assassination, then the only stable force within Pakistan will weaken, perhaps fatally.

That will leave only one political power: the mosques.

Answer 2

The nearest hands were her own. She elected to cooperate with others that has had her on a lethal edge of envelope for years. India, being first to lodge an official note on the crime,
had a prepared statement ready because her demise was
an expectation. Little love is lost between these two nations
and the murder was the latest evidence of a rogue national
body at large on the world stage. What a strange bedfellow
choice by an American President, eh? That she had 'good' hands herself is open to debate depending on whom elects to voice an opinion. That other hands are at murder is not disputed. Are some murdering hands closer than others?

Answer 3

It was clearly the work of those alleged neo-Naxis Allan Dulles, Prescott Bush, his Son and Grandson, W.Averill Harriman, the Cubans and the CIA---oh, wait, that's the paranoid, liberal, lunatic fringe Democratic conspiracy theory on Yahoo video about the JFK murder! I don't know though....could there be a chance???? No, not then, not now.

Answer 4

I would guess Al Queda. It has all their trademarks....Sorry guys I doubt the Pakistan president did it. If he had, he would've done it before resigning as head of the military. Makes no sense to do that, then kill your political opposition a few weeks later. On the other hand this has all the marks of Al Queada and Taliban working together.....

Answer 5

The President Of Pakistan and may be Al quaida. AND HER FATE

Answer 6

Dictator Pervez Musharraf.

Because she was his biggest political opponent and his seat was in serious threat on January 8 elections.

So he wiped her off the equation and put blame on someone else and fooled the world.

Answer 7

It benifits muscharaff the most, however, al quida has claimed they did it, and they are the people most likely to be blamed for it, as muscharaffs goverment is the one likely to remain in power and for stability in the region no major world power is going to outright denounce him. so as long as the terrorist sect wants the credit ,everyone will be willing to let them be blamed.

Answer 8

AlQaida are claiming responsibility for her murder, but i tink that these guys had the full abkcing aand suppoort of Musharraf for this action.

wat se?

Answer 9

Please reask this question in current events.

Answer 10

obviously Mussharraff duh!