first the news of pakistan told that she was assasinated by the terrrorists by firing and two bullets hit her in the neck and because of which she died and now they have changed the statement that she was hit by the handle of the roof of the car.Do u belive that hitting handle of the roof will cause so much damage that she will die ,then how come they said she was hit by the bullet in the neck without examining? dont u think there is some thing which is hided because of the riots taking place there and they want to prove that it was just an accident? comment please?
2007-12-28 15:53:20 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
i've heard that was hit in the neck with a bullet, then i heard that she was hit in the head by shrapnel, then i heard that she hit her head on the sunroof going down in the car...... they've got to be covering up something....what confuses me the most is why on earth they didn't do an autopsy.....the whole thing is weird...and its a shame for Pakistan. A beautiful, courageous woman is now gone.
Rest in peace Benazir Bhutto
2007-12-28 16:01:24 · answer #1 · answered by saraJ 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I heard Dr Michael Baden interviewed tonight on fox news by telephone he said it was not possible for her to have died from hitting her head.
He also said how would the Dr's in th hospital know exactly HOW she died without an autopsy, or a least cutting her hair, he claimed you cannot see bullet holes in a head full of hair and blood. He also questioned why her husband was so adamant about no autopsy being done, he doesn't buy the fact that she was Muslim..saying he himself has done quite a few of them on Muslims.
SOMETHING IS CERTAINLY GOING ON HERE!!
2007-12-28 17:35:49 · answer #2 · answered by djc1175 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Even if we are not sure of the exact wounds Bhutto suffered, we know she was attacked with gunshots and explosives and died as a result. This is what is important.
It would be quite understandable if initial reports did not know the exact cause of death.
It seems possible that, if she was struck with explosives, it may have slammed her head into the car hard enough to kill her.
2007-12-28 16:47:51 · answer #3 · answered by The First Dragon 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
This is a typical Paki lie. Indian spineless govenrment wants to deal with the slime ball Mush. It seems the loud North Indians who are calling the shots this days are stuff less bums who do not have the guts to call a spade a spade.
2007-12-28 16:12:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Media always changes its attitude.I think the first one was correct.Then the government changed it.I don't believe hitting head on a roof will kill a pearson.
2007-12-28 21:21:18 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Governments, in general, would always try to hide actual facts and put in circulation some story or other for public consumption!
So he who wants to know the truth must seek other sources only.
2007-12-28 18:20:27 · answer #6 · answered by The Tribune 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Media, we all know does not provide all the facts. One actually has to be witness to occurances and that to, can be shady. You and I could witness the same accident and give two different counts of what really happened. Bottom line, its interpretation. We all have our own interpretation.
2007-12-28 15:58:21 · answer #7 · answered by hbuckmeister 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bro u know what she was buried without doing any autopsy.. and this command was given by her husband .. so their is something that is fishy and now whose gonna take her place obviously her husband and don't you think something is fishy....
2007-12-28 16:02:03 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes. You are right.
2007-12-28 16:02:01 · answer #9 · answered by king 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was not an assassination. Someone just killed her. JFK was assassinated. Who did it or how she died doesn't matter. She's still dead.
2007-12-28 16:03:35 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋