Socialism makes rich countries poor...ask Eastern Europe.
2007-12-28 15:35:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by sepp55774 2
·
7⤊
5⤋
She is just not the best person for the job. Obama is.
wooglet....
Obama is the best man for the problems the US faces today. I think the three most difficult problems facing the US are overcoming the well earned mistrust of the billions of muslims in the world. Restoring our freedom in the United States, and restoring government for the people. And third restoring balance to the American budget. I think that Barrack Hussein Obama is the one best candidate to do those things.
Muslims beleive that this war is just a continuation of the crusades. The US is committing Genocide in their eyes. The accusations of racial, and religious prejudice have to disappear when our president is the son of a muslim, and his name is Saddam Hussein Obama.
Politics is the only job where proving you are not qualified is the best recommendation for the job. Hillary and everybody else in the race is a professional lifetime politician. Lifetime politicians are all here to fornicate with us against our will and behind our backs. Barak as a newcomer will not be able to use his vast network of loyalists to seize so much power that it makes him a dictator as the rest of the politicians except Ron Paul would be able to do. Ron Paul is actually the best man for this job, but he won't have any cred for the most important problem.
Barack is actually the weakest democrat on balancing the budget. But we cannot approach balancing the budget without accomplishing peace with the muslim world. Barack has said; "end the war in Iraq, end some of the special interest loopholes and earmarks that have been clogging up the system, then I think we can return to a path of a balanced budget." Source: 2007 Des Moines Register Democratic debate Dec 13, 2007 We do need to balance the budget but we will not be able to do it in the first one or two years of any president's term.
So of the three most important things all are dependent on making peace. Nobody can make peace faster than Obama. Obama is a step in the right direction on the other two. Restoring liberty, and balancing the budget. Obama is the best man for the job.
2007-12-28 17:27:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
She's a fake; like the other people here, have expressed. A woman, as president, is going to happen some day but do we really want it to be her?
I don't think the republican party has a chance of winning. I'm looking at the choice the democrats have produced and no one is impressive.
But if she is elected, there will be a lot of new jokes!
2007-12-28 16:04:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by mattitude 2
·
4⤊
0⤋
Well.. to be really frank, I don't think Americans will VOTE for a woman presidential candidate - I would LOVE a woman president one day, that would be an awesome change, but at the moment if Clinton becomes our next Democratic candidate, the Democratic party is screwed over in terms of actually winning the election; I personally don't think the majority of the country will vote for a woman, since none of the country seems to be moving forward in that direction..
Basically, if Clinton is the Democratic candidate, the Democratic party will get screwed and the Republicans will end up winning again... That's my theory...
So, maybe it's not necessarily that everyone hates her, but in broader terms, she may not win the election for the Democratic party, which is what might be holding a lot of voters back on voting for her as the Dem. candidate
2007-12-28 15:39:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by romantic 3
·
7⤊
1⤋
I liked Bill and I thought Hillary might be a good candidate. Then I started watching the debates, watching interviews with her, and reading up on her policies. She is pure politics as usual. She accepts vast amounts of money from corporate lobbyists. She directs personal (not policy oriented) attacks on her fellow candidates. She gives very vague, rehearsed answers that don't provide any real solutions. She is the product of focus groups, not someone who is genuine or honest. You don't have to take my word for it, you can study her more in-depth. But I think that she is the absolute worst Democratic candidate.
2007-12-28 15:40:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
7⤊
0⤋
As a New Yorker; I KNOW that Hillary has MISSED 70 % + of the Senate Votes & has NEVER drafted, written, endorsed, co-sponsored or voted on ANY legislation that has EVER benefitted New York.---Whenever New York faces a crisis of any kind or any issues that need to be resolved; New York Senator Chuck Schummer is ALWAYS attending to the needs of NY & Hillary is ALWAYS CONSPICUOUSLY ABSENT.---Hillary is the WORST Senator that New York has ever had,---Since you appear to be interested in voting for Hillary....I would be more than happy to ship her to you ( postage paid ) from New York ??
2007-12-28 15:53:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
0⤋
If I sat here and listed all the reasons why Hillery Clinton would make a lousy president, this would be the only question I'd have time to answer for months. It would just take too darn long.
2007-12-28 16:08:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
She lacks femininity. I don't feel any warmth and sincerity coming off her. If we ar going to have a woman President, then I want a passionate woman like Benazir Buhhto or Magarat Thatcher or Marlo Thomas.
Not a robot.
2007-12-28 17:19:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Campo 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Because in a patriarchial society, men do not want to have a women as their head because it would represent weakness within a country. Although America, is considered a mother country, Men and some people out there believe that she shouldn't run. lol Bill Clinton as 1st man, not 1st lady! lol!
2007-12-28 16:02:32
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
DrRocco...after being a serious contender for the President of the United States, do you really need a resume?
And show me one politician who hasn't flipped on at least one issue.
Basically, people are scarred that there is a woman capable of being the leader of the free world. I'd take Hillary over the lying, greedy, jerk who is in office now. His aspirations are to be told that he's smarter than Jessica Simpson acts. That's pretty sad on America's behalf that we (and by we I DON'T mean me) elected this man as our president TWICE.
2007-12-28 15:39:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by Go Herd 5
·
6⤊
4⤋
Because she moved to New York and lived there for a year just so she could become Senator.
2007-12-28 16:20:20
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋