Do you fell bad for the tiger that got killed just for doing what tigers are suposed 2 do in the wild? I do. Those guys got what they deseved.
2007-12-28 09:47:06 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
First of all, I feel if your going to keep an animal captive, knowing very well their behavior patterns, what goes around comes around. Don't kill an animal because you couldn't brain wash it to behave the way you want. An animal is not a trophy to be shown off in a caged environment. if it were meant to be like that they would have come from mama's snatch with a steal cage around it. I believe anyone who own's a zoo and uses animals to make a profit well lets just say that Tiger did minor damage to what should be done to meat heads like that. I hope that the next animal who attacks has been brain washed to know you go for the mans junk trunk and the famales floatation device.
2007-12-28 09:58:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
The tiger was being a typical tiger and the young men were being foolish. A very bad outcome for everyone involved but the tiger got the raw deal getting killed for that.
2007-12-28 10:09:37 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
I do feel badly for an animal dying because it did what was simply natural for it. It's understandable that it had to be killed so it wouldn't harm others -- but ultimately the zoo is responsible for insuring that the tiger could not escape.
This is a responsibility that the zoo failed to uphold; it's sad that innocent people and the tiger suffered for their incompetence.
2007-12-28 13:03:36 · answer #3 · answered by frenchy62 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
How is a leopard "evil" by means of stalking its prey? it is in simple terms the main suitable way for it to seek. heavily, dude, do no longer take personification to that time. the reason that's not evil for a tiger to kill a guy is by means of the fact maximum while human beings have been given jointly and created religions, maximum of them have been fairly sensible and that they found out it grew to become into in an animals nature to kill and eat issues. adult males besides the fact that have the skill to be malicious and kill for no reason. so they crated faith as a means to generate worry in those human beings as an attempt to maintain them from killing one yet another with the aid of fact so-and-so has an exceptionally advantageous pot that they p.c.. Or a sparkling spear. Or some relatively healthful goats. regardless of.
2016-10-20 05:17:42 · answer #4 · answered by sander 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They should not have been in the tigers pen to start with .Aside from that they should have left the Tiger in his own Habitat .When will humans learn not to invade The animal Kingdom if they annot accept the way they fight/ live /hunt.
2007-12-28 09:59:34 · answer #5 · answered by Lindsay Jane 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
yeah i feel bad for the tiger because animals are not humans they don't know the difference between right and wrong.
2007-12-28 10:03:59 · answer #6 · answered by ησяєєη 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Nope, don't feel sorry for the tiger or the victims.
Maybe the tiger is in tiger heaven free from captivity now.
2007-12-28 09:54:55 · answer #7 · answered by shogun_316 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Yes I do feel sorry for an animal who did not ask to be put in a zoo but until the 3 boys have been proved to have done something wrong you are wrong to say that they deserved to be attacked.
2007-12-28 09:56:57 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
No. That tiger attacked people and killed. They would do it to any animal that killed someone.
2007-12-28 09:54:28 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 6⤋
How many millions will they get for being dumb asses?
2007-12-28 10:13:01 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋