2007-12-28 08:33:17 · 23 answers · asked by a bush family member 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Because they think that's what the voters want to hear. They will do anything & say anything to get a vote, and if people haven't figured that out by now, then they are as crazy as the people they vote for. What most of the idiots that are answering your question fail to tell you is that Saddam & his sons were terrorists & weapons of mass destruction, all rolled up into one. They killed and slaughtered thousands and thousands of their own people & put them in mass graves. Does that sound a little bit like Hitler??? They were worse than Hitler. Hitler was not killing his own race or religion. Saddam & his sons and his Republican army killed their own people in "masses". I would say that was MASS DESTRUCTION, wouldn't you. And he helped with the training and the funding of Al Quida, so don't believe the other bullsh_t you hear from a bunch of bleeding heart liberals. How many of the people who have responded to this question would have wanted to live under Saddam's regime?? So, don't sugar coat what this inhumane bast_rd did. He and his whole regime deserved what they got.
2008-01-01 06:28:22 · answer #1 · answered by thesweetestone 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Against Bush means against the war. They went all in over this and will lose badly. Democrats do not have any principles and that is why they play this game.
2007-12-28 09:22:42 · answer #2 · answered by Chainsaw 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Who are some of these Democrats which you speak of? Please, when you make a broad generalization, have the cajones to back it up with some proof, not just sit there and whine like a 3rd grader. Thank you.
PS- any Democrat who did want blood probably wanted Bin Laden's blood, not the blood of people who had nothing to do with it I.E. Saddam "I made Bush Sr look like the fool that he is" Hussien or the thousands of Iraqi children who Bush has ordered the killing of.
2007-12-28 09:07:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
What's the connection between 9-11 and Iraq? Not much.
2007-12-28 09:04:18 · answer #4 · answered by Mitchell 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
We all demanded the blood of those who plotted 9/11. We were for the most part all approving when we into Afghanistan after them. Had we continued to fulfill that mission, bin Laden might already be dead or captured. But instead we put that on the back burner to go into Iraq, which had NO connection to 9/11 whatsoever. Thanks to this action, now Al Queda IS in Iraq, when they weren't beforehand, and we have an incredible mess in Iraq to clean up. Pretty straight forward, not too hard to understand this difference. Or is it?
2007-12-28 08:39:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 5⤋
They aren't against the war in Afghanistan, but against the war in Iraq. Now, they are entitled to their opinions but when they start doing things that border on treason, such as visiting Syria and badmouthing the US, saying the war is lost and our sitting president is a war criminal I draw the line. The Democrats have fallen a long way since Kennedy was president.
Thumbs down, for what, stating the facts. This is what they have done, sorry.
2007-12-28 08:37:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 5⤋
Supported going after Bin Laden and Al Queda in Afghanistan. Somehow that got side tracked into invading a country that had nothing to do with 911. Knew the reasons for the Iraq invasion the moment it happened.....2nd largest oil reserves in the world and billions to be made in bogus and no bid contracts.....Bush fooled no one other than the idiotic GOP followers.
2007-12-28 08:49:41 · answer #7 · answered by ndmagicman 7 · 4⤊ 4⤋
Democrats are two faced. Clinton was all that but tucked his tail and was really to busy skirt chasing to care about America. Hillary will be too. They are just trying to make a name for themselves (Freud) would be proud. These two Democrats are trying to make a fool out of true AMERICANS.
2007-12-30 22:14:09 · answer #8 · answered by Mouth of the South 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Because the Democrats always bow to the wishes of the people. It's very sad to watch the news and see and hear about all the soldiers losing their lives....it makes the public sentiment anti-war. What people tend to forget it that soldiers are paid for what they do and although it isn't a fortune they did sign up voluntarily.
2007-12-28 08:45:27 · answer #9 · answered by Nadine P 3 · 3⤊ 4⤋
I think they were demanding the blood of the folks responsible - bin Laden and al-Qaida.
As it is, the folks responsible are still at large on the Afghanistan-Pakistan border and the blood is being spilled in a country that had nothing to do with 9/11.
2007-12-28 08:37:26 · answer #10 · answered by Bob G 6 · 9⤊ 5⤋