English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-12-28 07:19:32 · 6 answers · asked by john s 2 in Arts & Humanities History

6 answers

Yes, they did. Two particular castle come to mind, used by the Royalists. One is Corfe Castle in Dorset (held by a woman) and Saltram Castle in Devon. Both underwent lengthy sieges. The Parliamentarians were so impressed by the bravery of the defenders of Saltram that they allowed them to eventually march out with colours flying. However, in both cases, after the defenders had left they were blown up to prevent further use, leaving the ruins that can be seen today.

2007-12-28 07:42:42 · answer #1 · answered by rdenig_male 7 · 0 0

Yes. One of the first things that the two forces did was to take posession of the local strong holds. They were so effective that, after the war and to prevent a Royalist counter, many of Englands castles were destroyed by explosives.

Luck

2007-12-28 16:42:08 · answer #2 · answered by Alice S 6 · 0 0

Yes. It was the last ride of the English castles. Although their style of fortification was vulnerable to cannon fire, many - almost all held by Royalists - put up a stiff resistance and after being taken were 'slighted' or ruined to prevent being used again.

2007-12-29 10:20:22 · answer #3 · answered by Jim L 7 · 0 0

Yes and the result are the many ruined castles we now see scattered across England and Wales.

Or, as the old joke goes....[music hall]...dah terrah dah...looking something like the ruin that Oliver Cromwell knocked about a bit....taraarah etc.

Usually in reference to some old bird or other, off stage.

2007-12-28 15:35:51 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think Oxford castle was involved. Oxford was the centre for the Royalists.

2007-12-28 15:34:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes they did.

2007-12-28 15:24:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers