2007-12-28 07:17:22 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Basketball
i would actually say nash amare marion. good question! after the trade with the celtics everyone though of the celtics' big three as the best but i'd say the suns have a better big three. also, they play much better together. nash is the playmaker who creates shots for everyone, is efficient and can score too, marion can't really create his own shot but is a great finisher and can shoot, rebound and defend, amare finishes everything in the paint, can create his own shot and also developed a nice defensive game and mid range shot. as for the celtics, garnett is great but i just don't see him as agressive enough. he doesn't take it to the hoop enough and plays outside and setles for mid range jumpers too much. allen is really just a shooter if you think about it. i'm not taking anything away from him but he shoots a very bad percentage because he takes very difficult shots. pierce i think is slowing down very fast. he doesn't seem the same to me. he also shoots a bad percentage because he takes very difficult shots.
2007-12-28 07:33:27 · answer #1 · answered by dwadefranchizemia03 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The Celtics Big Three, Garnett/Pierce/Allen.
2007-12-28 08:32:01 · answer #2 · answered by tfoley5000 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nash/Amare/Marion , NASH CAN SHOOT 3'S as well as Allen,he just does not shoot as often plus he is MR> ASSIST and makes all around him better, Amare is better offencive rebounder then Garrnet and gets to the free throw line more plus he's YOUNGER, Marion is a monster in all stat catagorys while Pierce is just a scorer(excellent I might add) but is also older then Shawn. There all top players but I'd take the Suns boys if it were my team.
To Nick B, The Celtics play in the EAST against a bunch of lame teams while the Suns play in the West against top notch competition thats why they have only lost 3 games. if they played in the West it would be a different story.
2007-12-28 07:32:55 · answer #3 · answered by Robert B Badd 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Suns. but it would go like this.
KG over Amare Stoudemire
Steve Nash over Ray Allen
Paul Pierce over Shawn Marion.
Even though there is more Celtics players on who I would take. I still think Suns work better and just plain are better together than the self proclaimed "big three". Steve, Marion and Stoudemire don't even think they are a big three. They just wanna win a damn championship so they do everything in there power to work together and without Nash the team would be nothing. Go Suns!
2007-12-28 07:46:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Definetly Nash/Amare/Marion because the boston 3 party was a team that was bought
2007-12-28 07:50:38 · answer #5 · answered by ? 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Garnett/Allen/Pierce. the Three Amigos are going to tear the NBA up this year. The window of opportunity has passed in Phx. This is Boston's year!
2007-12-28 07:35:36 · answer #6 · answered by catsfan37 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
garnett pierce allen, spurs have the championships with the aid of fact they have been twiddling with one yet another for an prolonged time, and this is the 1st season that the great 3 of boston has performed jointly. I assure that if Boston have been enjoying jointly for like 3 or 4 years they could have greater championships then the spurs (I advise interior the previous in the event that they have been enjoying jointly)
2016-10-20 05:00:45 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nash/Amare/Marion the Celtics are cheats!!!!!
2007-12-28 07:24:25 · answer #8 · answered by Iverson+Pats 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Garnett/Allen/Pierce because they actually have some defense.
2007-12-28 07:48:44 · answer #9 · answered by Keith H 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Garnett/Allen/Pierce b/c they only lost three games which were are close!
2007-12-28 07:20:46 · answer #10 · answered by Nick B 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋