No one is saying this. But right wingers are making up the accusation that Liberals are accusing Bush. Shabby to capitalize on tragedy.
2007-12-28 07:08:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
6⤋
It depends who you believe is responsible for organizing the assassination.
If you believe it was Pervez Musharraf the current President of Pakistan, then yes Bush is In-directly responsible as the US sent Aid to him when he was organizing a Military coup to gain power, and if he had not gained power Bhutto would never have fled the country and would probably have retained power.
If you believe the attack was organized by Al-Qaeda then it is "Bush senior" who you may find responsible, as he funded the early Al-Qaeda movement and is responsible for Osama bin Laden's training by the Cia. And so if he had never funded Al-Quada, they could not have organized the attack on Bhutto.
If you believe the attack was organized directly by Bush, your a nut-head.
If you believe the attack was just by a random suicide bomber then there is no connection.
So there is some relevance, it depends on who you actually believe directed the assassin. America's foreign policy effect most of the world, I doubt it was organized by the CIA, as Bhutto's manifesto was less Anti-American then Musharraf's.
Personally, I think it was just a random guy who was pissed of with the world and felt blowing himself up was the only way he could change it.
2007-12-28 15:17:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by sami 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
I mean really....some even say it was the US's responsibility to protect her. Seriously? That would indeed have been the quickest way get her assassinated. That being said, she knew her days were numbered and she hoped to make great strides before her demise. She was very brave and a great heroine. As for this being Bush's fault....America is the enemy in their eyes no matter who the president is. We are about to see that shortly when a new president takes his/her oath. It's a very sad day and we all need to spend more time on our knees.......and after that be aware and"VOTE".
2007-12-28 15:38:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by Perils of Paulette 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
I haven't seen any theories yet, but some bozo can always drum up something. The best thing is to ignore it. I know I used to get so fed up with the stupidity of people but I've learned it's normal.
:)
2007-12-28 15:20:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
What I am going to say is not a conspiracy theory. The asassination is Bush's fal because Musharraf is an American lackey, andpush didn't try to catch Bin Laden, therefore if either one was responsible. Bush must share the guilt
2007-12-28 15:16:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
I'm not a Bush fan but he was not responsible. No conspiracy. It was the radicals and terrorist in Pakistan. Period.
2007-12-28 15:33:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by Robert S 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
If your looking for fantasy scripts, how about this.
If Bush had not been giving them $7B a year they would have all had to get a Job and would not have the time to plot assassinations
This writers strike is starting to hurt.
2007-12-28 15:09:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by Guerilla Liberal fighter 3
·
2⤊
4⤋
Every singel thing that happens anymore is Bushes fault! No Jobs, High Gas Prices, 911 ECT!!!!!
2007-12-28 15:08:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by !!Just Peachy!! 5
·
1⤊
6⤋
It isn't, but that won't stop the conspiracy addicts from putting the assine theories forward.
2007-12-28 15:12:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by smsmith500 7
·
1⤊
5⤋
Have not heard of any conspiracy theories.
2007-12-28 15:07:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by Ollie 7
·
8⤊
4⤋