Seems like everyone thinks they are authorized to make coment on Gita. I have heard of over 500 unauthorized versions. Lord Krishna Says that this knowledge must be heard from one who is in a pure disciplic succession (lineage), steming all the way from Him. In Bhaktivedanta Prabhupdadas Intoduction to the Gita, he shows the pure lineage, how LordKrishna gave this wisdom to Brahma, then Brahma to Narada then to Vyasa to Mahdava to Padmanabha to nirhari, Madhava, Aksobhya, Jaya Tirta, Jnanasindhu,Dayanidhi, Vidyanidhi, Rajendra, Jayadharma, Purusottoma, Brahmanya Tirtha, Vyasa Tirtha, Laksmipati, Madhavendra Puri(Nityananda and Advaita), Lord Caitanya, Rupa (Svarupa, Sanatana), Raghunatha, Jiva, Krishnadasa, Narottama, Visvanatha, (Baladeva),Jagannatha, Bhaktivinoda, Garuakishora, Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati, and A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhuada. So why so many other unauthorized comentaries. I prefer the original Absolute Truth.It is just safer.Thanks.
Sincer educated answers please
2007-12-28
07:04:19
·
9 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ Philosophy
Well aristotle avatar. I can see you have been misled. As you can plainly see Gita was spoken by Lord Krishna Himself. SO your idea is incorrect. YOu must have read a malinterpertation of the Gita. That is the problem with Holy books. Man puts his filthy hands on them and changes the whole meaning.
2007-12-28
14:49:24 ·
update #1