Purpose of Human Existence?

Question

The way I see it, all physical matter has a tendency to, what I call, be "happy," or stabilize. An example of what I mean is certain molecules lose or gain electrons in order to "stabilize."
Well humans may be just a coincidence of particles forming into what we are. And as humans, we try to do what makes us "happy," or stable, in a sense. So there is no real purpose for us in this universe, but rather we are just following the laws of the universe.

But this is just an opinion from an atheist, and new to the subject, I'm interested in what other opinions are, religious or not.

Answer 1

I agree with you, sort of.
But, I don't think the fact that we are "accidents" of natural law means that there is no purpose... Although, you know what the real issue here is? Semantics. First off, you would have to define "purpose". The universe, in its wisdom designed everything as it is for a reason. Although its reasoning no doubt has a different meaning to it then ours does to us.

Answer 2

A purpose of human existence requires God.

“Unless you assume a God, the question of life’s purpose is meaningless.” –Bertrand Russell (noted 20th century mathematician, philosopher and Nobel laureate)

Russell was also an atheist but he knew that atheism meant no purpose to life and hence no meaning.

But we can't stand to think of our lives as meaningless so we invent things to do that will occupy our time and keep us from thinking about a meaningless existence. We call these inventions "reasons for living" and they serve our own need to survive for if we have no reason to live, we'll start thinking about suicide.

And suicide is a real problem as stated by this other atheist:

"There is only one really serious philosophical question, and that is suicide. Deciding whether or not life is worth living is to answer the fundamental question in philosophy. All other questions follow from that." (Albert Camus)

We know that things that have no purpose also have no worth so we have to at least get the feeling of having a purpose.

As the guy below me says, "Welcome to the reality of atheism " where there is no purpose, no meaning, and no point to life.

Answer 3

wow, you think all matter wants to be happy? Have you ever watched a nature show? Ever? It's brutal out there.

Welcome to the reality of atheism, but your science knowledge needs a boost. read some Stephen Jay Gould as a start.

Answer 4

Yes, the purpose is oneness with the universe, as you said to be both happy and tranquil.

As the Dalai Lama said in one of his books "The simplest & easiest way to be happy is by making others happy, and failing that at least do them no harm."

This oneness can only be attained through experience and determination/effort, so this is our purpose- to help, to experience and to achieve.

Answer 5

Everyone human makes to do something there is a purpose you were born.Helping teh world or ruining it. You came do a pesicifc job in the world it could be ruining the world or helping it.Everyone is working or doing a job that will help in the future.Even it could be killing or saving hope you understand

Answer 6

Yes, we are a fluke of the universe. Other options are unlikely and require faith.

Answer 7

Serve God.

Answer 8

Humanism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
See also the specific life stance known as Humanism
For the Renaissance liberal arts movement, see Renaissance humanism
Part of Philosophy series on
Humanism
(humanist philosophies)

Happy Human
International Humanist
and Ethical Union (IHEU)


Secular humanism
Humanism (life stance)
American Humanist Association
Council for Secular Humanism
A Secular Humanist Declaration

Religious humanism
Christian humanism
Ethical Culture
Humanistic Buddhism
Humanistic Judaism
Integral humanism


Related articles
Posthumanism
Neo-humanism
Incarnational humanism
Marxist humanism
List of humanists

History of humanism
Renaissance humanism
Humanism in Germany
Humanism in France
Humanist Manifesto

Philosophy Portal · v • d • e
Humanism is a broad category of ethical philosophies that affirm the dignity and worth of all people, based on the ability to determine right and wrong by appeal to universal human qualities—particularly rationality.[1][2] It is a component of a variety of more specific philosophical systems and is incorporated into several religious schools of thought. Humanism entails a commitment to the search for truth and morality through human means in support of human interests. In focusing on the capacity for self-determination, Humanism rejects the validity of transcendental justifications, such as a dependence on belief without reason, the supernatural, or texts of allegedly divine origin. Humanists endorse universal morality based on the commonality of the human condition, suggesting that solutions to human social and cultural problems cannot be parochial.[3]

Contents [hide]
1 Aspects
1.1 Religion
1.2 Knowledge
1.3 Speciesism
1.4 Optimism
2 History
2.1 Greek humanism
2.2 Renaissance humanism
2.3 Modern era
3 Modern humanist philosophies
3.1 Secular humanism
3.2 Religious humanism
4 Other forms of humanism
4.1 Educational humanism
5 See also
5.1 Manifestos and statements setting out Humanist viewpoints
5.2 Forms of humanism
5.3 Related philosophies
5.4 Organizations
5.5 Other
6 References
6.1 Notes
6.2 Bibliography
7 External links
7.1 Manifestos and statements setting out humanist viewpoints
7.2 Introductions to humanism
7.3 Web articles
7.4 Web books



[edit] Aspects

[edit] Religion
Humanism clearly rejects deference to supernatural beliefs in resolving human affairs but not necessarily the beliefs themselves; indeed some strains of Humanism are compatible with some religions. It is generally compatible with atheism and agnosticism but doesn't require either of these. The word "ignostic" (American) or "indifferentist" (British, including OED) are sometimes applied to Humanism, on the grounds that Humanism is an ethical process, not a dogma about the existence or otherwise of gods; Humanists simply have no need to be concerned with such questions. Agnosticism or atheism on their own do not necessarily entail Humanism; many different and sometimes incompatible philosophies happen to be atheistic in nature. There is no one ideology or set of behaviors to which all atheists adhere, and not all are humanistic.[4][5]

As Humanism encompasses intellectual currents running through a wide variety of philosophical and religious thought, several strains of Humanism allow it to fulfill, supplement or supplant the role of religions, and in particular, to be embraced as a complete life stance. For more on this, see Humanism (life stance). In a number of countries, for the purpose of laws that give rights to "religions", the secular life stance has become legally recognized as equivalent to a "religion" for this purpose.[6] In the United States, the Supreme Court recognized that Humanism is equivalent to a religion in the limited sense of authorizing Humanists to conduct ceremonies commonly carried out by officers of religious bodies. The relevant passage is in a footnote to Torcaso v. Watkins (1961). It is often alleged by fundamentalist critics of Humanism that the Supreme Court "declared Humanism to be a religion," however the Court's statement, a mere footnote at most, clearly does not in fact do so; it simply asserts an equivalency of Humanists' right to act in ways usual to a religion, such as ceremonial recognition of life's landmarks.

Renaissance humanism, and its emphasis on returning to the sources, contributed to the Protestant reformation by helping to gain what Protestants believe was a more accurate translation of Biblical texts.


[edit] Knowledge
According to Humanism, it is up to humans to find the truth, as opposed to seeking it through revelation, mysticism, tradition, or anything else that is incompatible with the application of logic to the observable evidence. In demanding that humans avoid blindly accepting unsupported beliefs, it supports scientific skepticism and the scientific method, rejecting authoritarianism and extreme skepticism, and rendering faith an unacceptable basis for action. Likewise, Humanism asserts that knowledge of right and wrong is based on the best understanding of one's individual and joint interests, rather than stemming from a transcendental truth or an arbitrarily local source.


[edit] Speciesism
Some have interpreted Humanism to be a form of speciesism, regarding humans as being more important than other species. The philosopher Peter Singer, himself a Humanist, stated that "despite many individual exceptions, Humanists have on the whole been unable to free themselves from one of the most central... Christian dogmas: the prejudice of speciesism".[7] He called on Humanists to "take a stand against... ruthless exploitation of other sentient beings", and took issue with statements in the Humanist Manifesto III, which he felt gave "precedence to the interests of members of our own species."[7] He also noted, however, that the same Manifesto stated that humans have "no God-given or inherent right to subdue other animals", and acknowledged that "the organizations that have done the most for animals have been independent of religion."[7]


[edit] Optimism
Humanism features an optimistic attitude about the capacity of people, but it does not involve believing that human nature is purely good or that each and every person is capable of living up to the Humanist ideals of rationality and morality. If anything, there is the recognition that living up to one's potential is hard work and requires the help of others. The ultimate goal is human flourishing; making life better for all humans. The focus is on doing good and living well in the here and now, and leaving the world better for those who come after, not on suffering through life to be rewarded afterward.


[edit] History
Contemporary humanism can be traced back through the Renaissance back to the Islamic Golden Age to its ancient Greek roots. Humanism can also be traced back to the time of Gautama Buddha (563-483 BCE) and Confucius (551–479 BCE) and the Warring States Period, though the term "humanism" is more widely associated with Western philosophers.

The term "humanism" is an early 19th century coinage, based on the 15th century Italian term umanista, which was used to designate a teacher or student of classic literature. The evolution of the meaning of the word humanism is fully explored in Nicolas Walter's Humanism — What's in the Word. [8]


[edit] Greek humanism
Main article: Greek philosophy
Sixth century BCE pantheists Thales of Miletus and Xenophanes of Colophon prepared the way for later Greek humanist thought. Thales is credited with creating the maxim "Know thyself", and Xenophanes refused to recognize the gods of his time and reserved the divine for the principle of unity in the universe. Later Anaxagoras, often described as the "first freethinker", contributed to the development of science as a method of understanding the universe. These Ionian Greeks were the first thinkers to recognize that nature is available to be studied separately from any alleged supernatural realm. Pericles, a pupil of Anaxagoras, influenced the development of democracy, freedom of thought, and the exposure of superstitions. Although little of their work survives, Protagoras and Democritus both espoused agnosticism and a spiritual morality not based on the supernatural. The historian Thucydides is noted for his scientific and rational approach to history.[9]


[edit] Renaissance humanism
Main article: Renaissance humanism
Renaissance humanism was a movement that affected the cultural, political, social, and literary landscape of Europe. Beginning in Florence in the last decades of the 14th century, Renaissance humanism revived the study of Latin and Greek, with the resultant revival of the study of science, philosophy, art and poetry of classical antiquity.[citation needed] The revival was based on interpretations of Roman and Greek texts, whose emphasis upon art and the senses marked a great change from the contemplation on the Biblical values of humility, introspection, and meekness. Beauty was held to represent a deep inner virtue and value, and an essential element in the path towards God.[citation needed]

Humanism's divergence from orthodox Christianity can be identified with the condemnation of Pelagianism by Jerome and Augustine. Like the Humanists, Pelagius perceived humans as possessing inherent capacity for developing the qualities that the church perceived as necessitating the gift of grace from God. Pelagius rejected the doctrine of original sin. The Humanists likewise recognize humans as born not with a burden of inherited sin due to their ancestry but with potential for both good and evil which will develop in this life as their characters are formed. The Humanists therefore reject Calvinistic predestination, and understandably therefore arouse the hostility of Protestant fundamentalists.[citation needed]

The crisis of Renaissance humanism came with the trial of Galileo, which forced the choice between basing the authority of one's beliefs on one's observations, or upon religious teaching. The trial made the contradictions between humanism and traditional religion visibly apparent to all, and humanism was branded a "dangerous doctrine."

Renaissance humanists believed that the liberal arts (music, art, grammar, rhetoric, oratory, history, poetry, using classical texts, and the studies of all of the above) should be practiced by all levels of wealth. They also approved of self, human worth and individual dignity.

Noteworthy humanists scholars from this period include the Dutch theologist Erasmus, the English author (and Roman Catholic saint) Thomas More, the French writer Francois Rabelais, the Italian poet Francesco Petrarch and the Italian scholar Giovanni Pico della Mirandola.


[edit] Modern era
One of the earliest forerunners of contemporary chartered humanist organizations was the Humanistic Religious Association formed in 1853 in London. This early group was democratically organized, with male and female members participating in the election of the leadership and promoted knowledge of the sciences, philosophy, and the arts.

In February 1877, the word "Humanism" was publicly used, apparently for the first time in America, to apply to Felix Adler, pejoratively. Adler, however, did not embrace the term, and instead coined the name "Ethical Culture" for his new movement — a movement which still exists in the now Humanist-affiliated New York Society for Ethical Culture.

Active in the early 1920s, F.C.S. Schiller considered his work to be tied to the Humanist movement. Schiller himself was influenced by the pragmatism of William James. In 1929 Charles Francis Potter founded the First Humanist Society of New York whose advisory board included Julian Huxley, John Dewey, Albert Einstein and Thomas Mann. Potter was a minister from the Unitarian tradition and in 1930 he and his wife, Clara Cook Potter, published Humanism: A New Religion. Throughout the 1930s Potter was a well-known advocate of women’s rights, access to birth control, "civil divorce laws", and an end to capital punishment.

Raymond B. Bragg, the associate editor of The New Humanist, sought to consolidate the input of L. M. Birkhead, Charles Francis Potter, and several members of the Western Unitarian Conference. Bragg asked Roy Wood Sellars to draft a document based on this information which resulted in the publication of the Humanist Manifesto in 1933. The Manifesto and Potter's book became the cornerstones of modern humanism. Both of these sources envision humanism as a religion.

In 1941 the American Humanist Association was organized. Noted members of The AHA included Isaac Asimov, who was the president before his death, and writer Kurt Vonnegut, who followed as honorary president until his death in 2007. Robert Buckman was the head of the association in Canada, and is now an honorary president.


[edit] Modern humanist philosophies
There are many people who consider themselves humanists, and much variety in the exact type of humanism to which they subscribe. There is some disagreement over terminology and definitions, with some people using narrower or broader interpretations. Not all people who call themselves humanists hold beliefs that are genuinely humanistic, and not all people who do hold humanistic beliefs apply the label of humanism to themselves.

All of this aside, Humanism can be divided into secular and religious types, although some Humanists, including the International Humanist and Ethical Union, reject the addition of any adjective at all to "Humanist," and instead intended the word to have universal application.


[edit] Secular humanism
Main article: Secular humanism
Secular humanism is the branch of humanism that rejects theistic religious belief and adherence to belief in the existence of a supernatural world. It is often associated with scientists and academics, though it is not limited to these groups. Secular humanists generally believe that following humanist principles leads to secularism, on the basis that supernatural beliefs cannot be supported using rational arguments and therefore all traditionally religiously associated activity must be rejected.

When people speak of Humanism in general, they are sometimes referring to secular humanism as a default meaning. Some secular humanists take this even further by denying that less anti-religious humanists qualify as genuine humanists. Others feel that the ethical side of humanism transcends the issue of religion, because being a good person is more important than rejecting supernatural beliefs. The Humanist Manifestos, which represent consensus statements of Humanists, present Humanism as an ethical process and a religion through which we can move above and beyond both the divisive particulars of older religious stances and the negation of these.

Some Humanists prefer the term Humanist (capital H, and no adjective), as unanimously endorsed by General Assembly of the International Humanist and Ethical Union following universal endorsement of the Amsterdam Declaration 2002.

The secular humanist movement, by that name, hardly existed prior to 1980. In 1979, Paul Kurtz lost his position as editor of The Humanist. Departing the American Humanist Association, he then launched his own publication, Free Inquiry, and founded the Council for Secular Humanism independently of the American Humanist Association yet pursuing essentially similar goals.


[edit] Religious humanism
Religious humanism is the branch of humanism that considers itself religious (based on a functional definition of religion), or embraces some form of theism, deism, or supernaturalism, without necessarily being allied with organized religion, frequently associated with artists, liberal Christians, and scholars in the liberal arts. It holds appeal for a number of Unitarians, Quakers, Anglicans and Lutherans. Subscribers to a religion who do not hold supernatural assertions as a necessary source for their moral values may be religious humanists. The central position of human beings in humanist philosophy goes with a humane morality; the latter alone does not constitute Humanism. A humanitarian who derives morality from religious grounds does not make a religious Humanist.

A number of religious humanists feel that secular humanism is too coldly logical and rejects the full emotional experience that makes humans human. From this comes the notion that secular humanism is inadequate in meeting the human need for a socially fulfilling philosophy of life. Disagreements over things of this nature have resulted in friction between secular and religious humanists, despite their commonalities.

Religious Humanism was studied and developed by the late Rev. Paul Beattie during his tenure as editor of Religious Humanism, a periodical which became Unitarian rather than Humanist after his death and continues as such today.

A Jewish form of religious Humanism was developed by the late Rabbi Sherwin Wine, who founded the Society for Humanistic Judaism, now a worldwide movement with 40,000 adherents.


[edit] Other forms of humanism
Humanism is also sometimes used to describe "humanities" scholars, (particularly scholars of the Greco-Roman classics). As mentioned above, it is sometimes used to mean humanitarianism. There is also a school of humanistic psychology, and an educational method.


[edit] Educational humanism
Humanism, as a current in education, began to dominate school systems in the 17th century. It held that the studies that develop human intellect are those that make humans "most truly human". The practical basis for this was faculty psychology, or the belief in distinct intellectual faculties, such as the analytical, the mathematical, the linguistic, etc. Strengthening one faculty was believed to benefit other faculties as well (transfer of training). A key player in the late 19th-century educational humanism was U.S. Commissioner of Education W.T. Harris, whose "Five Windows of the Soul" (mathematics, geography, history, grammar, and literature/art) were believed especially appropriate for "development of the faculties". Educational humanists believe that "the best studies, for the best kids" are "the best studies" for all kids. While humanism as an educational current was largely discredited by the innovations of the early 20th century, it still holds out, in some elite preparatory schools and some high school disciplines (especially, in literature).


[edit] See also
Humanism in Germany
List of basic humanism topics
List of humanists
Secular humanism
Category:Humanists

[edit] Manifestos and statements setting out Humanist viewpoints
Humanist Manifesto
Amsterdam Declaration 2002
A Secular Humanist Declaration

[edit] Forms of humanism
See the humanism philosophy box at top on the right.

[edit] Related philosophies
Deism
Existentialism
Eudaimonism
Extropianism
Infinitism
Marxist humanism
Objectivism (Ayn Rand)
Objectivity
Pragmatism
Rationalism

[edit] Organizations
Institute for Humanist Studies
International Humanist and Ethical Union (IHEU)
Rationalist International
Council for Secular Humanism
European Humanist Federation
American Humanist Association
British Humanist Association
North East Humanists, the largest regional Humanist group in the United Kingdom
Human-Etisk Forbund, the Norwegian Humanist Association
Humanisterna, the Swedish Humanist Association
Humanist Society of Scotland
Humanist Association of Ireland
Sidmennt, the Icelandic Ethical Humanist Association
Society for Humanistic Judaism
Humanist International
Humanist Movement
Humanist Party
Ethical Culture
Arnold P. Gold Foundation, for the advancement of humanism in medicine
For more organizations see Category:Humanist associations


[edit] Other
Antihumanism
Humanistic psychology
Misanthropy
Religious freedom — freedom of religion and belief
Social psychology
Speciesism
The study of Misanthropology

[edit] References

[edit] Notes
^ (2007) Compact Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press. “humanism noun 1 a rationalistic system of thought attaching prime importance to human rather than divine or supernatural matters. 2 a Renaissance cultural movement which turned away from medieval scholastic-ism and revived interest in ancient Greek and Roman thought.” This article handles sense 1. See history section and main article Renaissance Humanism for sense 2.
^ (1999) Collins Concise Dictionary. HarperCollins. “The rejection of religion in favour of a belief in the advancement of humanity by its own efforts.” .
^ Definitions of humanism (subsection). Institute for Humanist Studies. Retrieved on 16 Jan 2007.
^ Baggini, Julian (2003). Atheism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3–4. ISBN 0-19-280424-3. “The atheist's rejection of belief in God is usually accompanied by a broader rejection of any supernatural or transcendental reality. For example, an atheist does not usually believe in the existence of immortal souls, life after death, ghosts, or supernatural powers. Although strictly speaking an atheist could believe in any of these things and still remain an atheist... the arguments and ideas that sustain atheism tend naturally to rule out other beliefs in the supernatural or transcendental.”
^ Winston, Robert (Ed.) (2004). Human. New York: DK Publishing, Inc, 299. ISBN 0-7566-1901-7. “Neither atheism nor agnosticism is a full belief system, because they have no fundamental philosophy or lifestyle requirements. These forms of thought are simply the absence of belief in, or denial of, the existence of deities.”
^ Note: The topic of this article has a small initial character as Wikipedia guidelines prescribe for the name of a philosophy. The life stance named Humanism is capitalized as prescribed for the name of a religion. The International Humanist and Ethical Union, coordinating organized Humanist bodies worldwide, has recommended use of the capital H by its affiliates
^ a b c Peter Singer. Taking Humanism Beyond Speciesism, by Peter Singer. Retrieved on 2007-01-11.
^ Walter, Nicolas, 1997 Humanism — What's in the Word, Rationalist Press Association, London, ISBN 0-301-97001-7.
^ Potter, Charles (1930). Humanism A new Religion. Simon and Schuster, 64–69.

[edit] Bibliography
Petrosyan, M. 1972 Humanism: Its Philosophical, Ethical, and Sociological Aspects, Progress Publishers, Moscow.
Barry, P. 2002 Beginning Theory: an introduction to literary and cultural theory, 2nd edn, Manchester University Press, Manchester, U.K., p. 36
Everything2, 2002 Liberal Humanism, http://everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1321605
Liberal Humanism (Modernism) and Postmodernism 2001, http://herbergeronline.asu.edu/the220/notes/postmodern.html
Moon, B. 2001 Literary terms: a practical glossary, 2nd edn, Chalkface Press, Cotteslow, W.A., Australia, p.62
Phillwebb – Theoretical Resources Off– and On–line, 2007 Liberal Humanism http://www.phillwebb.net/History/TwentiethCentury/Modernism/LiberalHumanism.htm

[edit] External links

[edit] Manifestos and statements setting out humanist viewpoints
Humanist Manifesto I (1933)
Humanist Manifesto II (1973)
A Secular Humanist Declaration (1980)
Amsterdam Declaration (2002)
Humanist Manifesto III (2003)

[edit] Introductions to humanism
What Is Humanism? from the American Humanist Association
Morain, Lloyd and Mary: Humanism as the Next Step, from the American Humanist Association
Huxley, Julian: The Humanist Frame