English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Since they love each other so much, they should be together. Israel should really stop existing. Don't get me wrong, I think the Jewish people have the right to be there, or wherever they want, but I think the Jewish state thing was a bad idea. Or do you also think that everyone who once owned a land first, should have it back? This is only feeding anti-semitism and damaging their image greatly. If God said to them He will give them the land, than they shouldn't have to claim it with violence. It's either not theirs anymore or it is too soon for them to return. I don't know, I'm just wondering. What is your opinion?

2007-12-28 05:25:51 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

13 answers

If they like living in US, and US it's OK with it, that's a good solution to have peace.

Regards.

2007-12-28 05:38:12 · answer #1 · answered by iceman 7 · 0 0

The problem is that there were supposed to be TWO states side by side one Jewish and one Palestinian. The only one that came abpout was the Jewish one leaving the Palestinians without a state of their own.To the contributor who said it did not happen with violence he is WRONG. There was violence and even terrorism from the Israelis. That is not a judgement on my part that Israel should not exist though.

The real problem is justice. Not simply territorial but social, economic etc. The Palestinians are NOT allowed to simply join Israel and become one state with all the full rights of other Israeli citizens either. The fact that the Israelis want it to ALWAYS be a Jewish nation-state governed by a Jewish majority is problematic in and of itself. It would not be a problem if they were the only ones native to the area or if so many Israelis were not immigrants. But that is not the case.

The Israelis understandably want a jewish homeland in part in response and as a defense against millenia of persecution of Jews in other areas. That is understandable and supportable. What I do NOT support is the idea that they must trample on the rights of others in oprder to have such a state. They don't exactly have the greatest set of neighbors that is for sure. But then again they are not very neighborly either.
Compromise on all sides is in order.

I hope this answers your question.
PEACE

2007-12-28 05:39:43 · answer #2 · answered by Vince Foster 4 · 1 0

Yes I agree, They have caused way to many problems and cost us U.S. taxpayers endless amounts of money. They don't seem like they have any common sense and are very hateful to most all folks except their own. If they want a piece of desert so bad I say give them about 100.000 acres of land in the Nevada and move all their behinds over there and move their precious wall their too, but then again they still won't be happy.

2007-12-28 05:36:58 · answer #3 · answered by Robert B Badd 3 · 2 1

Ill warrant your a jew hating anti americanist muslim.. seeing as you said "since they love each other so much" as though this is a term for mockery.

Ive got no affiliation at all to the Jews, but, theres a war on, Islamic nutters knocked down the twin towers, blew up London, and massacred the Spanish civilians. The enemy of my enemy is my friend. That makes the jews my friend.

So i know whos side im on. Im all for sticking up for the Isreali, and crushing the Islamic regimes that sponsor terrorism. Lets leave Isreal where it is and keep battering them dirty terrorists instead.

The Yanks an the Brits can take it, we dont bow down to terrorism. Ive done 4 tours, ill do another 4 or die trying, but ill not rest till we defeat the Taliban, Al-Queda or any other prick that wants a scrap.

2007-12-28 05:40:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

Yep. Israel was a bad idea. So it was their land at one point 2 thousand years ago... America was the Native American's land at one point, I don't see anyone giving it back to them.

2007-12-28 05:31:19 · answer #5 · answered by just some chick 6 · 3 1

The US isn't the land that God promised to Abraham. Israel is. The Jews didn't take it through violence. The palestinians have tried to take it through violence since the first day of it's existance as a UN-sanctioned nation.

2007-12-28 05:55:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

Honestly, I think unless you've lived there (palestine, israel, lebanon, etc) then we really cannot comment on it.

We don't truly know what its like, we just know the pixie dust and fairy tale stories from one slant and the gloom and doom from another bias.

My opinion is let sovereign nations be sovereign nations and we need to stop butting our heads (and the UN) into every other free nations activities....outside of genocide.

2007-12-28 05:31:31 · answer #7 · answered by Phil M 7 · 1 1

I don't get why they aren't concentrating on their inside-instead of a piece of dirt-and it is mostly dirt-that everyone has been fighting over for centuries. Insane-and at this point-I don't see cHristain or Jewish teachings being used in how others are treated at all.

2007-12-28 05:31:28 · answer #8 · answered by ARTmom 7 · 2 1

They didn't claim it with violence, they claimed it by settling mostly uninhabited land then by being given the land they had settled by the UN. They've had to defend it ever since against violence, and have expanded their territory after being attacked.

2007-12-28 05:30:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

sounds like a question from a hater..........why is it no one likes to remember that in the 6-day war it was not Israel that attacked first....

even today when they get missles sent at them all the time, people like you still blame them for defending themselves....

2007-12-28 05:38:04 · answer #10 · answered by Twinkie Thief 7 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers