http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/asiapcf/12/28/pakistan.friday/index.html
It was a bullet to the neck. No, it was a bullet to the chest. No, it was whiplash.
Honestly, who gives a rats ***. It's still a murder. Are some idiots actually going to portray it as a lesser crime if she died "indirectly"?
Ugh.
2007-12-28 05:16:55 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Because people know that there's something fishy about the official story blaming Al Queda and they are seeking details that might explain it to them.
The prurient and servile U.S. corporate media seem bent on spreading Musharraf's propaganda that the Islamists, rather than he, killed his crooked and unrealistically idealized competitor.
However, in essence, you are correct - the exact cause of death is irrelevant as it is indisputable that she was assassinated.
What is less clear is who gave the order.
Did Musharraf do it or did his U.S. sponsors? If he did, did his "godfather" in Washington DC know about it, or did he go off on his own, knowing there would be little retribution by his sponsor?
I will admit, I AM curious.
2007-12-28 05:38:51 · answer #1 · answered by Dont Call Me Dude 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Well now the news is that .. it's attempt but ..
she not died with bullet ..
as she went down into car suddenly .. door lever hits her head and she not survived ..
it's in the Last press conference of Pakistan's ministry ..
2007-12-28 13:20:45 · answer #2 · answered by Virus 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well I think it is because the Pakistanis are trying to turn around and somehow attempt to conceal that it was an assassination. Can't expect anything smart out of those wild barbarians!
2007-12-28 13:25:42 · answer #3 · answered by Jen 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Actually she died by trying to duck back into the car and hit her head on a lever from the sunroof.
2007-12-28 13:20:42 · answer #4 · answered by DannyK 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There were no bullets, she hit her head and died from a fractured skull.
But keep the conspiracies going. What else do idle minds have to do?
2007-12-28 15:26:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Because she was a politician. What other use have they. It's not like an electrician/carpenter/mechanic/etc. that have real value and purpose in this life.
2007-12-28 13:28:21 · answer #6 · answered by Bob H 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Cause of death is important to an investigation.
2007-12-28 13:59:36 · answer #7 · answered by Yahoo Sucks 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
AGREED.
Her assassination ''STINKS'' all the way to the white house!!
It's staggering also hilarious that, if one gets upset stomach, therefore; Islamic extremist did it!!??!!
2007-12-28 13:56:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Ok....So lets say that I walk up to you on the street and kill you...Are you saying that you or your family wouldn't want justice or to know who did it? What if I didn't kill you but you slipped on the ice and cracked your head open because I shot a gun up into the air??? are you saying that you would consider me guilty either way???
There's a big difference.
If she died because of her own negligence, no one but her is guilty moron.
2007-12-28 13:37:38 · answer #9 · answered by Violation Notice 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Ya, I'm tired of hearing that too but she was a prime minister soooo......
2007-12-28 13:19:27 · answer #10 · answered by billy j 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋