Please do not answer if you are rabid supporter of one party or the other - I do not want angry answers, just thoughtful ones.
I am certainly not in any easy to define catagory.
1.) I abhor illegal immigration and feel strongly that this country is already too populated at over 300 million. I feel we need to slow down on legal immigration (from ALL countries) or our children and grandchildren will suffer terribly.
2.) I also strongly feel that we need to protect the environment. As we get bigger we use more natural resources. To the extent that increasing fuel mileage is meaningless if we continue to grow in numbers (see #1).
3.) We need to hold people accountable for EVERY decision they make. If they have kids they need to pay for them themselves. If they don't want to work then they can starve. We need to stop taking money from one group of people and giving it to another group. There should only be exceptions for the truely disabled but nobody else.
2007-12-28
04:51:31
·
21 answers
·
asked by
youarewrongbobisright
5
in
Politics & Government
➔ Elections
It seems to me that politicians are now in the business of trying to buy the elections by promising people "things & stuff". One promises everyone healthcare. Another promises some people that they will make the wealthy pay more taxes. Another promises that religeon will stay on the forfront. Still others would let corporations do anything in the name of profit.
These are all empty promises - they can't possibly work in the long run and will only further divide our country.
Healthcare for all would bankrupt our economy.
Taxing the wealthy more will only make them move their moeny offshore like the Kennedy clan (who want higher taxes).
Returning to a religeon base will only alienate millions and force us into unwinable supreme court challenges.
Big business intrests certainly do not align with the average worker - lower wages, offshore jobs, no benefits, etc.
2007-12-28
04:57:40 ·
update #1
Several have said I am republican. Yet they spout religeon and corporate intrests above all else. Those are not my values.
I think I truely yearn for the democratic party of old - the working mans party of the40's, 50's and 60's.
2007-12-28
04:59:50 ·
update #2
Bro, welcome to the swing voters.
Democrats focus on supporting the poor, while taking from the rich and middle class (I have personal tax records over the last 16 years that prove it to me as a middle class professional, not posting though). They work with a platform attractive to the younger liberal masses but tend to lose focus on issues when together.
Republicans use socially conservative middle class individuals to fuel a group of upper class individuals who want to protect their money from being used to support the lower classes.
Like a good portion of Americans, you find yourself not associating with a good portion of the values of either party. You find yourself in a mix of the two, and because that makes you a Moderate, you end up having to deal with choosing "the lesser of two evils".
George Washington, the first President of the United States, argued that political parties would harm this country [1], and as the political structure shows today, it continues to polarize the country based on partisan politics.
My suggestion would be to read up specifically on all the candidates, rate each of your values on a scale of 1-10 and then rate the candidate's stand on each of them. Then add the total of each candidate up, based on your personal assessment of their values stated, and use that point total to determine who you will vote for.
Remember, you can register as "Independant" as well, though I would consider doing the point system soon so you can make sure your candidate gets your vote in the Primaries. You don't need to associate yourself with a party to vote in their primary, but can only vote in one primary as an Independant.
2007-12-28 05:39:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Christopher T 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
You sound like someone who is Honest, responsible, hard working, and uses common sense. You are a republican. ( mid right wing conservative republican ). That is something great, you can now argue with any democrat about politics and win every time. Be care full though democrats like to make things up or they will try to confuse the simple truths to win a political argument. Believe me when I say this, THEY WILL LIE and make up what they call facts. They do this because without it they can not win.
2007-12-28 04:59:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by Tea Party Patriot 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The media is "some distance" from balanced: it consistently has been and it consistently would be. The media comments for the prosperous, and in elementary terms the prosperous: it ignores - thoroughly - a minimum of ninety 5% of the inhabitants. as quickly as we are advised by means of the "information" media that Labour rules will destroy the financial gadget and "each and every person" will go through, it means that the best 5% could lose somewhat of their earnings. The "information" isn't an guidance source, that's a controlling mechanism that ensures that the conventional public comprehend as low as achieveable approximately each and every thing. Blair had to undertake tory rules to get his party elected following over a decade of working-type hate proclaims. regrettably he in no way reverted decrease back to a genuine Labour ethos. point out the be conscious socialist and individuals certainly become violent as we communicate - fairly yanks - attempt telling every person that capitalism is destroying the planet and you get laughed at. Rupert Murdoch controls this planet, of that there is not any doubt, and if 'The sunlight' tells the people who Cameron is the 2nd coming, then that's what they're going to have faith. 2 events characterize workers interior the united kingdom as we communicate: the SLP and the SWP. The chief of the SLP grew to become into destroyed by means of MI5 in 1985, and the conventional public nevertheless have faith the garbage that they've been advised approximately him. The SWP won't perform interior the capitalist electoral gadget, effectively taking itself out of the political section. of direction, that which we are advised by means of the "information" media is lots from precise besides.
2016-10-20 04:37:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by limson 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think you are on the fence, and choosing one party over the other would not be appropriate in your case. I seriously think that you will need to look at the final 2 that will be up for the job and vote for whomever represents you best. It is tough, I understand. I call myself a Democrat, but I have voted for Republicans in the past, simply because at that time I felt that the person I voted for was best for the job.
2007-12-28 05:15:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by catywhumpass 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
1 puts you with the Republicans. 2 puts you with the Democrats. 3 puts you with the Republicans on rhetoric, but actually it puts you against both parties, since the Democrats believe in shifting money from the rich to the middle class and poor, and the Republicans are at least equally intent on shifting wealth in the opposite direction. You won't particularly fit in with either party, so you'll just have to check out the candidates and see which one looks better.
2007-12-28 05:01:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by A M Frantz 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sorry to say so but I suspect none can be free of the business interests. At best you can do research to find out who has voted closest to your wishes over all at vote-smart.org
2008 PRESIDENTIAL RACE
Contributions from Selected Industries
Display:
Oil & Gas
Rudolph W. Giuliani (R)
$545,058
Mitt Romney (R)
$309,933
Hillary Clinton (D)
$220,550
John McCain (R)
$189,935
Bill Richardson (D)
$126,600
Fred Thompson (R)
$112,650
Barack Obama (D)
$106,112
Sam Brownback (R)
$54,415
Christopher J. Dodd (D)
$38,550
Ron Paul (R)
$34,102
John Edwards (D)
$27,850
Mike Huckabee (R)
$18,450
Joseph R. Biden Jr. (D)
$16,650
Tom Tancredo (R)
$6,450
2007-12-28 05:33:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by PrivacyNowPlease! 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
You sound like a fairly conservative person. For the most part republicans run on those issues, but rarely follow through on it. I guess I'm saying that neither party really represents you.
Like you, i am frustrated that none of the top candidates seem to have a hard-line stance on immigration.
2007-12-28 06:30:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Manbearpig 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
You are more Republican than Democrat. The second item might seem like it is in the realm of Democrats, but there are some conservatives who extend conservatism to conserving the environment as well.
2007-12-28 04:56:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by S C 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
You sound like an independent. But if you care wondering what presidential canidates most closely align with your values a friend of mine sent me a great quiz that will help you know who to be behind in that case. Check it out!
http://minnesota.publicradio.org/projects/ongoing/select_a_candidate/poll.php?race_id=13
2007-12-28 05:30:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by Aunt Tita 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Seem like you are leaning toward the Republican side but you defiantly have some Democratic views.
2007-12-28 05:15:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by Coach K 4
·
0⤊
0⤋