I ask this question because I've just had a disscussion with my other half who said"what with ET being the hit it was why did they never do a sequel" I persoanlly think it would have ruined ET...anyone else agree.
2007-12-28
03:39:44
·
24 answers
·
asked by
snikleback
5
in
Entertainment & Music
➔ Movies
*Personally even lol
2007-12-28
03:40:09 ·
update #1
Jungle Jungle...I asked my question 5 minutes after ET finished on ITV today,I also asked,wanting a normal answer...I read your question,not really the same were they?!
2007-12-28
04:21:30 ·
update #2
You're right E.T. is not a movie that would have lent itself well to a sequel, there really isn't that much more ground to cover.
I liked X-Men 2, Spiderman 2, Next Friday, Bourne 3, Grease 2 (just kidding, just wanted to see if you were paying attention), Terminator 2
Basically any time you are dealing with movies that have lots of characters or extensive story (X-Men, Lord of the Rings, Spiderman etc...) you are going to do well with a sequel because you can get right into the action where you have to spend a lot of time setting everything up in the first movie.
2007-12-28 04:36:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
The Empire Strikes Back! Ok technically not just a sequel, part two in a trilogy, I know, but for me, as much as i enjoyed A New Hope, Empire was just so much darker and enlarged the Star Wars universe so much more! Of course without Hope we would never have got Empire!
2007-12-28 03:43:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by Andromeda Newton™ 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I trust the Christmas trip post. additionally Toy tale 2 I liked the Empire strikes lower back greater effective than massive call Wars and Shrek 2 greater advantageous than Shrek (gotta love that Puss In Boots or perhaps Donkey grow to be funnier the 2nd time around)
2016-10-02 11:44:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sequels better than the original. I can only think of two.
First is Terminator 2. An excellent film.
Second is The Empire Strikes Back.
2007-12-28 03:43:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by DMsView 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
Sequels generally are worse than their predecessor.
A Very Brady Sequel was better than the original Brady Bunch movie (which isn't saying much, lol). And Princess Diaries 2 had some scenes which I thought were better than the first one; overall, I'm not sure it was better.
And while it's part of a trilogy, I really enjoyed Scream 2 over 1 and 3. (They actually talk about this issue in that movie.)
2007-12-28 04:04:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by xK 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
I would say Rush Hour 3 was better than Rush Hour 1 and 2, but thats my own opinion! Sequels mostly are better because if the first movie was even a slight hit then they could get a lot more funding! Cheaper by the Dozen 2 was well better than the first one!!
2007-12-28 03:46:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by -luvnmyipod- 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
Godfather two
Empire Strikes Back
Meet the Fockers
2007-12-28 05:50:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by Michael F 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Airplane 2
2007-12-28 11:24:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by RETRIBUTION 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Harry Potter
2007-12-28 03:48:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
The Godfather 2
and
Spiderman 2
2007-12-28 03:42:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋